Location of Repository

Nonlinear dynamics in economics and finance and unit root testing

By Efthymios Pavlidis, Ivan Paya, David Peel and Costas Siriopoulos

Abstract

This paper illustrates the flexibility of the ESTAR model to encompass a number of different characteristics found in economic and financial series, such as multiple equilibria, complex dynamics, chaotic-like behavior, and spurious trends. We then re-assess the power of the Kapetanios et al. (2003), Enders and Granger (1998), and Augmented Dickey Fuller unit root tests in the presence of nuisance parameters for parameter values typically encountered in the empirical literature. Our results show the lack of dominance of any particular test and that the power is not independent to priors about the nuisance parameters. Finally, we examine several asset price deviations from fundamentals and one hyper-inflation series and find contradictory results between the nonlinear fitted models and unit root tests. The findings highlight that new testing procedures with higher power are desirable

Topics: HB Economic Theory
Year: 2013
DOI identifier: 10.1080/1351847X.2011.607006
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lancs.ac.uk:39678
Provided by: Lancaster E-Prints

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1996). Analysing Inflation by the Fractionally Integrated doi
  2. (2000). arbitrage activity, and stock price dynamics,” doi
  3. (1997). Chaotic behaviour in a simple model of inflation,” Chaotic behaviour in a simple model of inflation, doi
  4. (1993). Chaotically switching Bear and Bull Markets, The Derivation of Stock Price Distributions from Behavioral Rules,”
  5. (2010). Chartists and Fundamentalists in the U.S. Housing Market,” Working Paper Series,
  6. (2002). Covered Interest Rate Arbitrage in the Interwar Period and the Keynes-Einzig Conjecture,” doi
  7. (1992). Dynamic Equilibrium and the Real Exchange Rate in a Spatially Separated World,” Review of Financial Studies, doi
  8. (2006). Exchange Rate Puzzles: A tale of Switching Attractors,” European Economic Review, doi
  9. (1993). Exchange Rate Theory: Chaotic Models of Foreign Exchange Markets, doi
  10. (2002). Forecasting with Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models,” doi
  11. (2005). General Equilibrium Model of Arbitrage Trade and Real Exchange Rate Persistence,” doi
  12. (2006). House Prices, Fundamentals and Bubbles,” doi
  13. (2004). Intermittent chaos in a model of financial markets with heterogeneous agents,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, doi
  14. (1996). Introduction to Statistical Time Series, doi
  15. (1982). Irregular growth cycles,” American Economic Review,
  16. (2003). Is It So Difficult to Beat the Random Walk Forecast of Exchange Rates?,” doi
  17. (2002). Mean reversion in stock index futures markets: A nonlinear analysis,” doi
  18. (2001). Monetary Policy and Multiple Equilibria,” American Economic Review, doi
  19. (2000). Non-linear Dynamics of Inflation doi
  20. (2003). Nonlinear Equilibrium Correction in U.S. doi
  21. (2001). Nonlinear Mean-Reversion in Real Exchange Rates: Toward a Solution to the Purchasing Power Parity Puzzles,” International Economic Review, doi
  22. (1988). Nonlinearity And Complex Dynamics In Economics And Finance,” Working papers, Wisconsin Madison - Social Systems
  23. (1985). On endogenous competitive cycles,” Econometrica, doi
  24. (1988). Pentti Saikkonen, and Timo Te¨rasvirta, “Testing Linearity Against Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models,” International Economic Review, doi
  25. (2003). Purchasing Power Parity Adjustment Speeds in High Frequency Data when the Equilibrium Real Exchange Rate is Proxied by a Deterministic Trend,” doi
  26. (1996). Real Exchange Rate Behavior: The Recent Float from the Perspective of the Past Two Centuries,” doi
  27. (2009). Regional Housing Prices in the USA: An Empirical Investigation of Nonlinearity,” doi
  28. (2001). Risky Arbitrage, doi
  29. Testing for a Unit Root in the Nonlinear STAR doi
  30. Transactions Costs and Nonlinear Adjustment in Real Exchange Rates: An Empirical Investigation,” doi
  31. (1998). Unit-Root Tests and Asymmetric Adjustment with an Example Using the Term Structure of Interest Rates,” doi
  32. (2001). Why is it so difficult to beat the random walk forecast of exchange rates,” Working Paper Series, European Central Bank doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.