Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Reliability of perceptions of voice quality: evidence from a problem asthma clinic population

By C. Sellars, A.E. Stanton, A. McConnachie, C.P. Dunnet, L.M. Chapman, C.E. Bucknell and K. Mackenzie


<p>Introduction: Methods of perceptual voice evaluation have yet to achieve satisfactory consistency; complete acceptance of a recognised clinical protocol is still some way off.</p>\ud \ud <p>Materials and methods: Three speech and language therapists rated the voices of 43 patients attending the problem asthma clinic of a teaching hospital, according to the grade-roughness-breathiness-asthenicity-strain (GRBAS) scale and other perceptual categories.</p>\ud \ud <p>Results and analysis: Use of the GRBAS scale achieved only a 64.7 per cent inter-rater reliability and a 69.6 per cent intra-rater reliability for the grade component. One rater achieved a higher degree of consistency. Improved concordance on the GRBAS scale was observed for subjects with laryngeal abnormalities. Raters failed to reach any useful level of agreement in the other categories employed, except for perceived gender.</p>\ud \ud <p>Discussion: These results should sound a note of caution regarding routine adoption of the GRBAS scale for characterising voice quality for clinical purposes. The importance of training and the use of perceptual anchors for reliable perceptual rating need to be further investigated.</p&gt

Topics: R1
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Year: 2009
OAI identifier:
Provided by: Enlighten

Suggested articles


  1. A comparison of two perceptual voice evaluation training programs for naive listeners.
  2. (2006). A E STANTON, A MCCONNACHIE et al. 76258 Shrivastav R. Multidimensional scaling of breathy voice quality: individual differences in perception.
  3. (2003). Acoustic and perceptual indicators of normal and pathological voice. Folia Phoniatr Logop
  4. (1991). Adolescents’ perceptions of normal and voice-disordered children.
  5. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. London: Chapman and Hall,
  6. (2002). and intrarater reliability of cervical auscultation to detect aspiration in patients with dysphagia. Clin Rehabil
  7. (2005). Application of psychometric theory to the measurement of voice quality using rating scales. J Speech Lang Hear Res
  8. (1998). Assessment of two objective voice function indices. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
  9. (1981). Clinical Examination of Voice, 1st edn.
  10. Common practices of voice therapists in the evaluation of patients.
  11. (2000). Comparison of pulmicort pMDI plus nebuhaler and pulmicort turbuhaler in asthmatic patients with dysphonia. Respir Med
  12. (1996). Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol
  13. Documentation of progress in voice therapy: perceptual, acoustic, and laryngostroboscopic findings pretherapy and posttherapy.
  14. Dysphonia associated with inhaled steroids.
  15. (1985). Effect of teacher training sessions on listener perception of voice disorders. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch
  16. (1994). Evaluation of dysphonia in a children’s choir. Folia Phoniatr Logop
  17. (2004). Evidence-based treatment of paralytic dysphonia: making sense of outcomes and efficacy data. Otolaryngol Clin North Am
  18. Factors predicting patient perception of dysphonia caused by benign vocal fold lesions.
  19. (2000). Formal perceptual evaluation of voice quality in the United Kingdom. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol
  20. (1995). Frequency of voice problems and cough in patients using pressurized aerosol inhaled steroid preparations.
  21. Generalizability of scores influences by multiple sources of variance.
  22. In:
  23. Individual differences in voice quality perception.
  24. Inhaled corticosteroids: hazardous effects on voice – an update.
  25. Interobserver perceptual analysis of smoker’s voice. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci
  26. Judging personality and appearance from voice disorders.
  27. Listeners’ perceptions of normal and voice-disordered children. Folia Phoniatr
  28. Measuring vocal quality. In:
  29. Multiparametric evaluation of dysphonic severity.
  30. Perceived vocal morbidity in a problem asthma clinic.
  31. Perception of dysphonic voice quality by naive listeners.
  32. Perceptual and acoustic characteristics of voice changes in reflux laryngitis patients.
  33. Perceptual and laboratory assessment of dysphonia.
  34. (1993). Perceptual evaluation of dysphonia: reliability and relevance. Folia Phoniatr Logop
  35. Perceptual evaluation of voice quality and its correlation with acoustic measurements.
  36. Physiological evaluation of the upper airway in a problem asthma clinic.
  37. Re: evaluation of voice quality.
  38. (1998). Reliability and clinical relevance of perceptual evaluation of pathological voices. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol
  39. Reliability and validity of cervical auscultation: a controlled comparison using videofluoroscopy. Dysphagia
  40. Reliability in perceptual analysis of voice quality.
  41. Reliability of clinician-based (GRBAS and CAPE-V) and patient-based (V-RQOL and IPVI) documentation of voice disorders.
  42. Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment.
  43. Subjective and objective evaluation of voice quality in patients with asthma.
  44. Teachers’ ability to accurately identify disordered voices. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 1992;23:
  45. (1997). Test-retest study of the GRBAS scale: influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality.
  46. (2008). The effect of anchor modality on the reliability of vocal severity ratings.
  47. The effect of information on listeners’ attitudes toward speakers with voice or resonance disorders.
  48. The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners’ judgments of dysphonic voice.
  49. The effect of speaking task on perceptual judgment of the severity of dysphonic voice.
  50. (1996). The perceptual evaluation of voice disorders.
  51. The relationship between ratings of voice quality and quality of life measures.
  52. (2005). The reliability and validity of patient self-rating of their own voice quality. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci
  53. (2004). The reliability of three perceptual evaluation scales for dysphonia. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
  54. The spectrum of upper airway problems in a problem asthma clinic – the role of the larynx.
  55. The spectrum of upper airway problems in a problem asthma clinic – the role of the nose.
  56. (2003). The use of an auditory model in predicting perceptual ratings of breathy voice quality.
  57. (2004). The voice symptom scale (VoiSS) and the vocal handicap index (VHI): a comparison of structure and content. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci
  58. Vocal quality, articulation and audiological characteristics of children and young adults with diagnosed allergies. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
  59. (1960). Voice and Articulation Drillbook, 2nd edn.
  60. (1998). What determines the differences in perceptual rating of dysphonia between experienced raters? Folia Phoniatr Logop

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.