Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Do health improvement programmes fit with MRC guidance on evaluating complex interventions?

By M. Mackenzie, C. O'Donnell, E. Halliday, S. Sridharan and S. Platt

Abstract

Although planning of new health policy could be improved to enable more robust evaluation, Mhairi Mackenzie and colleagues argue that randomised controlled trials are not always suitable or practical

Topics: RA
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.gla.ac.uk:24882
Provided by: Enlighten

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1996). Anticipatory care and the role of Dutch general practice in health promotion. Patient Educ Counselling doi
  2. Complex interventions or complex systems? Implications for health economic evaluation. doi
  3. Complex interventions: how "out of control" can a randomised controlled trial be? BMJ 2004;328:1561-3.[Free Full Text] doi
  4. (2005). Delivering for health. Stationery Office,
  5. (2008). Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. London: Medical Research Council, doi
  6. Evaluating service delivery interventions to enhance patient safety. doi
  7. (1998). Evaluation: methods for studying programs and policies. 2nd ed.
  8. Evidence for public health policy on inequalities: 1. The reality according to policymakers. doi
  9. Experimentation and social interventions: a forgotten but important history. BMJ 1998;317:1239-42.[Free Full Text] doi
  10. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ 2000;321:694-6.[Free Full Text]
  11. (2009). House of Commons Health Committee. Health inequalities third report of session 2008-09. Stationery Office,
  12. (2008). National evaluation of Keep Well: interim report national level.
  13. (1995). New approaches to evaluating community initiatives. Volume 1: concepts, methods and contexts.
  14. Quality of primary care in England with the introduction of pay for performance. doi
  15. (1997). Realistic evaluation. doi
  16. Running along parallel lines: how political reality impedes the evaluation of public health interventions—a case study of exercise referral schemes in England. doi
  17. Theorising interventions as events in systems. doi
  18. Twenty five years of case finding and audit in a socially deprived community. BMJ 1991;302:1509-13.[Abstract/Free Full Text] doi
  19. (2007). Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model BMC Health Serv Res doi
  20. Using programme theory to evaluate complicated and complex aspects of interventions. Evaluation 2008;14:29-48.[Abstract/Free Full Text] doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.