Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Direct and mediated impacts of product and process characteristics on consumers’ choice of organic vs. conventional chicken

By Livia Marian and John Thøgersen

Abstract

There is a lack of research into why consumers value process characteristics. In this study, we test the hypothesis that the impact of process characteristics such as organic and free-range on consumers’ choices of food products is at least partly mediated through expected eating quality or taste expectations. In other words, the process characteristics partly function as cues to (eating) quality. Using a traditional metric conjoint approach based on an additive model, four product characteristics (production method, price, size and information about farmer and rearing conditions) were varied in a fractional factorial conjoint design, creating nine profiles of whole chickens. 384 respondents rated the nine different chickens in terms of taste expectations and willingness to buy. \ud Since the nine records for each respondent are not independent, we used linear mixed modelling for the mediation analysis, We find that, as expected, taste expectations are a strong predictor of willingness to buy. As hypothesized, the impact of both product and process characteristics on willingness to buy is at least partly mediated through taste expectations. Hence, the study shows that process characteristics are important for consumers, not only in and off themselves, but partly because consumers make inferences about eating quality from knowledge about such process characteristics. \ud \u

Topics: Markets and trade
Year: 2012
OAI identifier: oai:orgprints.org:21935
Provided by: Organic Eprints

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2001). Attitudes towards organic foods among Swedish consumers.
  2. (2012). Consumer Decision Making Regarding a “Green” Everyday Product.
  3. (2009). Consumer Decision-Making with Regard to Organic Food Products Traditional Food Production and Rural Sustainable Development. A European Challenge
  4. (2002). Consumer motivations in the purchase of organic food: A meansend approach. British food journal
  5. (2000). Consumer perception of fresh meat quality: a framework for analysis.
  6. (2004). Consumer perceptions of poultry meat: a qualitative analysis. Nutrition and food science,
  7. (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence.
  8. (2002). Consumers’ food choice and quality perception: Aarhus School of Business,
  9. (2009). Diversity in the determinants of food choice: A psychological perspective. Food quality and preference,
  10. (2010). Effect of Organic Poultry Purchase Frequency on Consumer Attitudes Toward Organic Poultry Meat.
  11. (2010). Food Acceptance: The Role of Consumer Perception and Attitudes. Chemosensory perception,
  12. (2005). Food quality and safety: consumer perception and demand.
  13. (1998). Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory.
  14. (2006). Investigating the concept of meat quality from the consumers’ perspective: The case of Greece.
  15. (2006). Is there a real difference between conventional and organic meat? Investigating consumers’ attitudes towards both meat types as an indicator of organic meat’s market potential.
  16. (2007). Mediation analysis.
  17. (2009). Organic Food Quality and Safety Perception Throughout Europe.
  18. (2004). Organic pork: consumer quality perceptions. [Project paper,
  19. (2002). Perceptions of pork and modern pig breeding among Danish consumers. Aarhus: Aarhus School of Business.
  20. (2009). Personal determinants of organic food consumption: a review.
  21. (2004). Producers and consumers of organic meat: A focus on attitudes and motivations. British food journal
  22. (2000). Quality attributes and quality cues Effective communication in the UK meat supply chain.
  23. (2010). Sensory Experiences and Expectations of Organic Food.
  24. (1991). Social Cognitive Theory of Self-regulation. Organizational behavior and human decision processes,
  25. (2009). Tasting quality: the roles of intrinsic and extrinsic cues. Asia Pacific
  26. (2000). The importance of intrinsic and extrinsic cues to expected and experienced quality: an empirical application for beef. Food Quality and Preferences,
  27. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.
  28. (2002). The social psychology of food.
  29. (2007). Theories of food choice development Understanding Consumers of Food Products
  30. (2007). Who are organic food consumers? A compilation and review of why people purchase organic food.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.