Article thumbnail

T

By 

Abstract

here are several aspects of Christopher Ward’s editorial in the December issue1 with which one must take issue. The first is his use of the technical psychiatric term ‘‘somatisation’’, a word much used by some neurologists, but unfortunately almost always outside its tightly defined DSM IV context.2 Loose usage of a defined concept is never a productive way forward; it simply encourages a pejorative rather than a healing approach. Professor Ward follows this path by accusing neurologists of regarding functional symptoms as unreal. In this context, he uses the term ‘‘functional’ ’ to embrace symptoms no

Year: 2016
OAI identifier: oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.975.3820
Provided by: CiteSeerX
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://pn.bmj.com/content/9/2/... (external link)
  • http://pn.bmj.com/content/9/2/... (external link)
  • http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/v... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.