Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Taxation of multinational banks : using formulary apportionment to reflect economic reality (Part 1)

By Kerrie Sadiq

Abstract

Formulary apportionment does not attempt to undertake a transactional division of a highly integrated multinational entity. Rather, it allocates income to the jurisdictions based on an economically justifiable formula. Opposition to formulary apportionment is generally based on the argument that it is not a theoretically superior (or optimal) model because of the implementation difficulties. The conclusion that the unitary taxation model may be theoretically superior to the current arm's-length model that applies to multinational banks, despite significant implementation, compliance, and enforcement issues, is based on the unitary taxation model providing greater alignment with the unique features of these banks. The formulary apportionment model looks to the economic substance of the multinational entity and, in this sense, adopts a substance-over- form approach. Formulary apportionment further recognizes the impossibility of using arm's-length pricing for economically interdependent multinational entities. A final advantage to formulary apportionment, which is also a consequence of this model achieving greater inter-nation equity, is the elimination of double taxation

Topics: 150199 Accounting Auditing and Accountability not elsewhere classified
Publisher: W G & L Financial Reporting & Management Research
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.qut.edu.au:49733
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://ria.thomsonreuters.com/... (external link)
  • https://eprints.qut.edu.au/497... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.