Location of Repository

Challenging the assumptions of positivism : an analysis of the concept of society in Sampi on behalf of the Bardi and Jawi people v Western Australia [2010] and Bodney v Bennell [2008]

By Marcelle J. Burns


The requirement to prove a society united by a body of law and customs to establish native title rights has been identified as a major hurdle to achieving native title recognition. The recent appeal decision of the Federal Court in Sampi on behalf of the Bardi and Jawi People v Western Australia [2010] opens the potential for a new judicial interpretation of society based on the internal view of native title claimants. The decision draws on defining features of legal positivism to inform the court’s findings as to the existence of a single Bardi Jawi society of ‘one people’ living under ‘one law’. The case of Bodney v Bennell [2008] is analysed through comparitive study of how the application of the received positivist framework may limit native title recognition. This paper argues that the framing of Indigenous law by reference to Western legal norms is problematic due to the assumptions of legal positivism and that an internal view based on Indigenous worldviews, which see law as intrinsically linked to the spiritual and ancestral connection to country, is more\ud appropriate to determine proof in native title claims

Topics: 180101 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Law, 180122 Legal Theory Jurisprudence and Legal Interpretation, Native title, Proof, Legal theory, Indigenous law
Publisher: Native Title Research Unit, Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.qut.edu.au:42111

Suggested articles


To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.