Location of Repository

Extensible business reporting language: an interpretive investigation of the democratisation of financial reporting

By Barry Peter Smith


Computer and telecommunications technologies are commonly thought to provide solutions to the quantitative and qualitative demands on modern financial reporting. Extensible Business Reporting Language (‘XBRL’) is an emergent technology that is purported to ‘democratise’ financial reporting. This investigation of whether XBRL democratises financial reporting is undertaken from a constructivist perspective. An interpretive research framework is regarded as appropriate to the current maturity XBRL. XBRL-knowledgeable individuals are asked whether they agree with the assertion that 'XBRL democratises financial reporting'. In addition, their perceptions of each of 'XBRL', 'financial reporting' and 'democratisation' are elicited in order to assess whether they have a common interpretation of the assertion. Sixty-seven percent of survey respondents profess to agree with the assertion, 13% explicitly disagree and 20% are non-committal. However, interpretation and analysis of each of the concepts reveal statistically significant relationships between responses to the assertion and interpretations of its constituent concepts. It is concluded that respondents are not agreeing and disagreeing about the same phenomena. This thesis illustrates that the rhetoric of technological determinism does not yet describe the reality of the relationship between financial reporting and XBRL. However, as XBRL matures, the approach adopted in this thesis may be re-applied to monitor perceptions of XBRL over time

Topics: T Technology (General), HG Finance, JA Political science (General), HF5601 Accounting
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:etheses.bham.ac.uk:1531

Suggested articles



  1. (2001a), ‘Technological Determinism in American Culture’,
  2. (2010). (2010f), ‘Working Groups
  3. (2001). A Close Reading Protocol to Identify Perception-Fashioning Rhetoric in Web Site Financial Reporting:
  4. (1960). A Comparative Factorial Analysis of Job Semantic Structures of Managers and Workers’,
  5. (2004). A Corporate Character Scale to Assess Employee and Customer Views of Organization Reputation’,
  6. (2008). A Fast Form Approach to Measuring Technology Acceptance and Other Constructs’,
  7. (2007). A framework for developing semantic differentials in IS research: Assessing the meaning of electronic marketplace quality
  8. (1981). A Scale to Measure Self-Concepts, Person Concepts, and Product Concepts’, doi
  9. (1998). A Structured Approach for Presenting Theses’, [online] doi
  10. (2010). About the XBRL Advisory Council’, [online] International Accounting Standards Committee Foundation. Available at:
  11. (2010). About the XBRL Quality Review Team’, [online] International Accounting Standards Committee Foundation. Available at:
  12. (2000). Accountability: An Ever Expanding Concept?’,
  13. (1982). Accounting and Corporate Accountability’, Accounting,
  14. (1991). Accounting as a Critical Social Science’, Accounting,
  15. (1987). Accounting Systems in Organisational Contexts: A Case for Critical Theory’, Accounting,
  16. (2005). An Exploration of the Potential for Studying the Usage of Investor Relations Information through the Analysis of Web Server Logs’, doi
  17. (1996). and Being Shaped’,
  18. (1979). Attitude Research in Accounting: A Model for Reliability and Validity Considerations’,
  19. (1989). Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-control as a Theme in Political Thought’,
  20. (2010). Available at: http://tinyurl.com/269lkuk [Accessed
  21. (2010). Available at: http://tinyurl.com/29jx3ay [Accessed
  22. (2010). Available at: http://tinyurl.com/2vr5xgr [Accessed
  23. (2010). Available at: http://tinyurl.com/33w6bab [Accessed
  24. (2010). Available at: http://tinyurl.com/3xfp7ce [Accessed
  25. (2010). Available at: http://tinyurl.com/3yh3569
  26. (2010). Available at: http://tinyurl.com/lrvdgm
  27. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research’, doi
  28. (1999). Business Reporting on the Internet: A Report Prepared for the International Accounting Standards Committee’, London: International Accounting Standards Committee.
  29. (2001). Business Reporting: Harnessing the Power of the Internet for Users’, Edinburgh: Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.
  30. (1987). Can Technology Protect Democracy?’, Roosevelt Center for American Policy Studies, Volume 165, Sage Library of Social Research.
  31. (1992). Can We Research a Field We Cannot Define? Towards an
  32. (2010). Committee’, [online]
  33. (1995). Conditional-Normative Accounting Methodology: Incorporating Value Judgements and Means-End Relations of an doi
  34. (1978). Connotative Meaning and its Role in Accounting Change: doi
  35. (1996). Considerations When Constructing a Semantic Differential Scale’, [online] La Trobe Papers
  36. (2003). Constructing, Persuading and Silencing: The Rhetoric of Accounting Standards’, doi
  37. (1989). Contingency, Irony and Solidarity’, doi
  38. (1994). Corporate Accountability and Rorty’s Utopian Liberalism’, Accounting,
  39. (2002). Corporate Communications for the 21st Century: A White Paper Discussing the Impact of Internet
  40. (1998). Corporate Dialogue in the Digital Age', London: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.
  41. (2004). Corporate Reporting on the Internet by German Companies’, doi
  42. (2005). Corporate Reporting on the Internet: Some Implications for the Auditing Profession’,
  43. (2000). Corporate Reporting, Stakeholders and the Internet: Mapping the New Corporate Landscape’,
  44. (2008). Costs and Benefits of XBRL Adoption: Early Evidence’, doi
  45. (1995). Cybercasting about Cyberspace’,
  46. (2006). Democratic Data Will Put Investors in the Driving Seat’, Financial Times,
  47. (1983). Development of a tool for measuring and analysing computer user satisfaction’, doi
  48. (2008). Do Early and Voluntary filers of Financial Information in XBRL Format Signal Superior Corporate Governance and Operating Performance?’, doi
  49. (2004). Does Search-Facilitating Technology Improve the Transparency of Financial Reporting?',
  50. (2007). Economic Consequences of Internet Financial Reporting',
  51. (1993). Educational Research: Current Issues’,
  52. (2000). Electronic Distribution of Business Reporting Information’,
  53. (2005). et al.,95 95 The other contributors to the article were
  54. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error’, doi
  55. (1992). Expert Systems and AIbased Decision Support
  56. (2004). Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Understanding Concepts and Applications’,
  57. (1983). Factor Comparability as a Means of Determining the Number of Factors and Their Rotation’,
  58. (2006). Financial Accounting Theory’,
  59. (2005). Financial Reporting and Auditing Agent with Net Knowledge (FRAANK) and Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL)’,
  60. (2004). Financial Reporting on the Internet by 2010: A Consensus View’, doi
  61. (2000). Financial Reporting on the Internet’, Chartered Accountants Journal of New Zealand, doi
  62. (2006). Financial Reporting Using XBRL:
  63. (2002). Foundations and Frameworks for AIS Research’,
  64. (1988). Framework for the Presentation and Preparation of Financial Statement’, London: International Accounting Standards Committee.
  65. (1992). Fundamental Factors for Assessing Controls: A Semantic Analysis’, [online]
  66. (1996). Idealism and the Sociology of Knowledge’,
  67. (2002). Immediate Trends in Internet Reporting’, doi
  68. (2004). Increased Stakeholder Dialogue and the Internet: Towards Greater Corporate Accountability or Reinforcing Capitalist Hegemony?’, Accounting,
  69. (1999). Information Technology Development Methodologies: Towards a Non-Positivist Developmental Paradigm’,
  70. (2004). Institutional Reality, Financial Reporting and the Rules of the
  71. (2010). Insufficient discriminant validity: A comment on
  72. (1994). Integrating Case Study and Survey Research Methods: An Example in Information Systems', doi
  73. (2006). International Financial Accounting and Reporting’, Dublin: Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland.
  74. (1978). Introduction to Factor Analysis: What it is and How to do it’,
  75. (1979). Language and Organisation’,
  76. (1999). Locating Czech Democracy: A Semantic Differential Analysis of the Meaning of Democracy among Students and Teachers
  77. (2004). Locating Democracy: Meanings and Intersections in the Czech Republic’, pp311-330
  78. (1991). Management Research: An Introduction’,
  79. (1973). Measurement of Meaning in Financial Reports’,
  80. (1998). Measuring Meaning in Accounting: Sharing Connotations of Underpinning Concepts’,
  81. (1995). Methodological Themes, Empirical Research in Accounting: Alternative Approaches and a Case for ‘Middle-Range’
  82. (1987). Models of Democracy’,
  83. (2003). On Economic Reality, Representational Faithfulness and The True and Fair Override’, doi
  84. (2002). On the Rhetoric and Relevance of IS Research Paradigms: A Conceptual Framework
  85. (2006). Online Business Reporting: An Information Management Perspective’,
  86. (2010). pages. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/29snw59
  87. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use,
  88. (1974). Perceptions of the Value of a Management Information System’, doi
  89. (2002). Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance', Cambridge:
  90. (1986). Positive Accounting Theory’,
  91. (2004). Progress on XBRL from an Australian Perspective’, doi
  92. (1978). Psychometric Theory’, 2nd Edition,
  93. (1992). Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement’,
  94. (1986). Radical Developments in Accounting Thought’,
  95. (1981). Reason, Truth and History’, Cambridge:
  96. (2006). Remarks by Sir David Tweedie (Chairman,
  97. (1999). Research Methodology: A Step by Step Guide for Beginners’,
  98. (2005). Research Methods and Society: Foundations of Social Enquiry’,
  99. (2004). Research Methods: A Tool for Life’,
  100. Researching XBRL as a Socio-technical Object’,
  101. (1987). Scale Construction’,
  102. (1973). Semantic Differential Methodology for the Structuring of Attitudes’, doi
  103. (1991). Social Reality and the Measurement of its Phenomena’,
  104. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life’,
  105. (2006). Speech by SEC Chairman: Videotaped Remarks,
  106. (2000). Spice up the Story – A Survey of Narrative Reporting in Annual Reports’,
  107. (1980). Statement of Financial Concepts No. 2: Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information’,
  108. (1999). Statement of Principles for Financial Reporting’, London: Accounting Standards Board.
  109. (2001). Technological Determinism Revisited’,
  110. (1988). Technological Development’,
  111. (2003). The Auditor and Corporate Reporting on the Internet: Challenges and Institutional Responses’, doi
  112. (2003). The Balance Scorecard: What is the Score? A Rhetorical Analysis of the Balanced Scorecard’, Accounting,
  113. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality’, doi
  114. (1975). The Corporate Report’, London: Accounting Standards Steering Committee.
  115. (1996). The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril in the Age of Networked Intelligence',
  116. (2000). The Five Major Accounting Firms and AICPA See XBRL as maybe being the Most Revolutionary Change in Financial Reporting since the First General Ledger’,
  117. (1997). The Future of Accounting and Financial Reporting, Part IV:
  118. (2000). The Future of Financial Reporting in Europe: Its Role in Corporate Governance’, doi
  119. (2003). The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad’, doi
  120. (1999). The Future of Intelligent Internet Agents in European Financial Reporting',
  121. (2010). The IFRS Taxonomy’, [online] International Accounting Standards Committee Foundation. Available at:
  122. (1999). The Internet and the Future of Corporate Reporting in doi
  123. (1993). The Measurement of Attitudes’
  124. (1988). The Measurement of Meaning in Accounting: A Critical Analysis of the Principal Evidence’, Accounting, doi
  125. (2001). The Production and Use of Semantically Rich Accounting Reports on the Internet: XML and XBRL’,
  126. (1999). The Research Pyramid: A Framework for Accounting Information Systems Research’,
  127. (1992). The Rhetoric of Science and the Rhetoric of Revolt in the Story of Positive Accounting Theory’, Accounting,
  128. (1974). The Semantic Differential: A Device for Measuring the Interprofessional Communication of Selected Concepts’,
  129. (1990). The Semantic Differential: A Prescription for use in Accounting Research’,
  130. (1972). The Semantic Dimensions of Financial Statements’,
  131. (1993). The Sharing of Meaning between Accounting Practitioners and Students’, doi
  132. (1987). The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or How
  133. (1994). The Structure of Meaning in Accounting: A Cross-Cultural Experiment’,
  134. (2003). The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and the Future’,
  135. (1975). The Use of Semantic Differential Scales in Studying the Innovation Boundary’,
  136. (1970). Toward a Rational Society’, doi
  137. (1988). Towards a theory of cultural influence on the development of accounting systems internationally’, doi
  138. (1987). True and Fair View: an Empirical Study of Connotative Meaning’, doi
  139. (2001). Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model’,
  140. (2009). US-GAAP Taxonomies, Release
  141. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioural impacts’,
  142. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View’,
  143. (1995). What Theory is Not, Theorising Is’,
  144. (2010). What’s a Yahoo! Group?’, [online] doi
  145. (2010). XBRL and IFRSs’, [online] International Accounting Standards Committee Foundation. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/39psnd7
  146. (2006). XBRL: A Revolution in Corporate Reporting?’,
  147. (2007). XBRL: An (Open) Source of Enlightenment or Disillusion?’,
  148. (2006). XBRL: An Impacts Framework and Research Challenge’,
  149. (2003). XBRL: Don’t Lag Behind the Digital Information Revolution’,
  150. (2005). XBRL: The Standardised Business Language for 21st Century Reporting and Governance’,
  151. (2004). XML Made Simple’, Oxford: Elsevier Debreceny,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.