Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Collaboration in clinical education : development, implementation and evaluation of an innovative model of clinical education for undergraduate nursing students

By Robyn Elizabeth Nash


Introduction The purpose of this study was to enhance the prac experience of undergraduate nursing students and registered nursing staff. An innovative model of clinical education, the Clinical Education Unit (CEU) model was developed, implemented and evaluated. Background to the study Clinical education is a vital component of the undergraduate nursing curriculum. 'Real world' practice provides students with the opportunity to develop the knowledge, attitudes and skills needed to function effectively as a registered nurse. Despite the commitment of universities to produce competent graduates, there has continued debate regarding the preparedness of new graduates for practice as registered nurses. This has focussed continued attention on the adequacy of students' clinical education and, in particular, on the models used for clinical facilitation/supervision. There is little published evidence that clearly demonstrates the effectiveness of any of the current models of clinical education or that any particular model is better than any other in achieving quality outcomes (Wellard, Williams and Bethune 2000; Clare, White, Edwards and Van Loon 2002). Hence, as recommended in the recent National Review of Nurse Education (2002), ongoing evaluation of nursing curricula and teaching practice, including clinical education, is clearly warranted. Methods The study utilised action research methodology to examine the effects of the Clinical Education Unit (CEU) on the quality of clinical prac as experienced by undergraduate nursing students and registered nurses working with the students in wards where they were placed for their practicums. It was undertaken in two iterations or phases: Phase 1 - Development, implementation and initial evaluation of an innovative model of clinical education (the CEU model) and Phase 2 - Refinement and re-evaluation of the CEU model of clinical education. Using focus group discussions and survey questionnaires, qualitative and quantitative data were collected from undergraduate nursing students and clinical nursing staff in conjunction with each iteration of the study. Results Phase 1 results indicated that the CEU model was evaluated more positively by students and registered nurses than were the non-CEU models that were used for comparison. This result was demonstrated in the comments of students and registered nurses with regard to the respective models of clinical education and supported by their ratings of the quality of clinical experience through the QPE-Phase questionnaires. A similar trend was found in the results from Phase 2. The CEU-2 model was again evaluated more positively by students and registered nurses than were the non-CEU models that were used for comparison. Conclusion In summary, the results of this study indicate that the CEU model had a positive impact on the prac experience of students and registered nurses. In both phases of the study, students and registered nurses in wards where the CEU model was being used evaluated the prac experience more positively than did students and registered nurses in wards where non-CEU models were being used. Two key factors were found to be important in achieving this outcome: the collaborative nature of the CEU model and nursing staff ownership of students' clinical education. These factors provided an operating framework which enabled the development of positive learning environments in the wards where students were placed for prac. Equally important were arrangements for the supervision of students' practice which involved local clinical facilitation and the explicit inclusion of other nursing staff in the ward. Further, continued support from the university to allow the clinical facilitators to take a supernumary role when facilitating students, to provide staff development for clinical education and to support staff on a day-to-day basis during the prac was also important, if not essential. It is proposed that these factors, acting synergistically, promoted enhanced access to learning opportunities for students and improved learning outcomes for students and staff. The study makes an important contribution to nursing education by providing evidence that can inform future developments in the area of undergraduate clinical education. It has potential benefits for nursing education not only in the local context, but within the international arena as well

Topics: models of clinical education, clinical learning environment, clinical supervision, clinical placement, clinical learning outcomes, quality of clinical experience and undergraduate students
Publisher: Queensland University of Technology
Year: 2007
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1996). A collaborative approach to team building between staff and students in long term care.
  2. (1991). A collaborative model for the clinical education of baccalaureate nursing students.
  3. (1998). A collaborative preceptor model for clinical teaching of beginning nursing students.
  4. (1998). A critical appraisal of the role of triangulation in nursing research,
  5. (2001). A new paradigm for practice education.
  6. (2004). A practice change model for quality improvement in primary health care.
  7. (1998). A review of preceptorship in undergraduate nursing education: implications for staff development.
  8. (2005). A Step-by-Step Approach to Using
  9. (1985). A study of nurse teachers’ conceptualization of their ward teaching role.
  10. (2003). Achieving change in health care practice.
  11. (1991). Action Research for Educational Change.
  12. (1995). Action Research for Health and Social Care.
  13. (1996). Action research for the study of organisations.
  14. (2001). Action research in action.
  15. (1994). Action research: A few details, a caution and something new.
  16. (2000). Action research: a suitable method for promoting change in nurse education.
  17. (2006). Action research: a variable option for effecting change.
  18. (1989). Action research: philosophy, methods and personal experiences.
  19. (1998). Action research: the debate moves on.
  20. (1985). Action Science.
  21. (2000). Address to Rethinking Nursing: National Nursing Workforce Forum. Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care,
  22. (2000). Ambiguity, complexity and dynamics in the membership of collaboration.
  23. (1978). An assessment of the scientific merits of action research.
  24. (2001). An Evaluation of the Pilot Project for Clinical Placement Facilitation. Chester:
  25. (2000). An evaluative study of clinical preceptorship.
  26. (2000). An exploration of the epistemological intricacies of using qualitative data to develop a quantitative measure of user views of health care.
  27. (1980). An inquiry into the ward learning environment.
  28. (1992). An interpersonal skills approach to the learning triad: Client, student and educator.
  29. (2005). Analysing the teaching effectiveness of clinical nursing faculty of full- and part-time generic BSN, LPN-BSN and RN-BSN nursing students.
  30. (1992). Approaches to audiotape and videotape analysis: Interpreting the interactions between patients and physicians.
  31. (2005). Assertiveness in nursing practice: An action research and reflection project.
  32. (2001). Assessing Australian undergraduate clinical learning.
  33. (1993). Baccalaureate nursing students’ perspectives of their clinical nursing leadership experience.
  34. (1986). Becoming Critical: Knowing through Action Research.
  35. (1998). Beyond preceptorship and supervision: a third clinical teaching model emerges for Australian nursing education.
  36. (2001). Bridging theory and practice in the supervisory relationship: a sociocultural perspective.
  37. (1997). Can action research be made more rigorous in a positivist sense? The contribution of an iterative approach.
  38. (1994). Capturing the group effect in focus groups: A special concern in analysis.
  39. (2003). Casualisation of the nursing workforce in Australia: driving forces and implications.
  40. (1987). Characteristics of the “best” and “worst” clinical teachers as perceived by university faculty and students.
  41. (1994). Choosing an appropriate methodology.
  42. (2005). Clinical education facilitators: a literature review.
  43. (1996). Clinical education: a system under pressure.
  44. (1991). Clinical education: students’ and tutors’ views.
  45. (2006). Clinical educators’ empowerment, job tension and job satisfaction: a test of Kanter’s theory.
  46. (1996). Clinical evaluation – difficulties experienced by sessional clinical teachers of nursing: a qualitative study.
  47. (1996). Clinical nurses as teachers of nursing students.
  48. (2001). Clinical nurses as teachers: Insights from students of nursing in their first semester of study.
  49. (1991). Clinical performance of university graduates.
  50. (1993). Clinical role modelling: uncovering hidden knowledge.
  51. (2001). Clinical staff as mentors in pre-registration undergraduate nursing education: students’ perceptions of mentors’ roles and responsibilities.
  52. (1994). Clinical supervision skills: a Delphi and critical incident technique study.
  53. (1995). Clinical support and the project 2000 nursing student: factors influencing this process.
  54. (1994). Clinical teaching associate model: creating effective BSN student/faculty/staff nurse triads.
  55. (2004). Clinician and student evaluation of a collaborative clinical teaching model.
  56. (1993). Coding and managing data.
  57. (2003). Collaboration as a tool for resolving the nursing shortage.
  58. (2006). Collaborative partnerships for nursing faculties and health service providers: what can nursing learn from business literature?
  59. (1993). Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches.
  60. (2000). Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies.
  61. (1995). Competencies of new registered nursesa survey of deans and health care agencies in the state of Hawaii.
  62. (1996). Creating Collaborative Advantage.
  63. (2000). Critique of the graduate nurse: an international perspective.
  64. (1999). Dedicated education units: 1. A new concept for clinical teaching and learning.
  65. (1999). Dedicated education units: 2. An evaluation.
  66. (2001). Development and analysis of a hospital survey instrument. Commissioned Research Project, National Review of Nursing Education.
  67. (2002). Development of the Clinical Learning Environment Inventory: Using the theoretical framework of the learning environment studies to assess nursing students’ perceptions of the hospital as a learning environment.
  68. (2004). Discursive influences on clinical teaching in Australian undergraduate nursing programs.
  69. (2000). Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook. Thousand Oaks,
  70. (1994). Education for clinical practice: an alternative approach.
  71. (1986). Educational preparation for clinical teaching.
  72. (1990). Effect of psychiatric clinical learning site on nursing students’ attitudes towards mental illness and psychiatric nursing.
  73. (1994). Effective clinical teaching behaviours from the perspective of students, supervisors and teachers.
  74. (1997). Effective field supervision: occupational therapy students’ perspectives.
  75. (1984). Effectiveness of the clinical instructor: students’ perspectives.
  76. (1999). Evaluating a clinical partnership for undergraduate nursing students.
  77. (2003). Evaluating Clinical Learning Environments: Creating Education-Practice Partnerships and Benchmarks for Nursing. AUTC Phase Two Final Report. Adelaide :
  78. (1999). Evaluating the Quality and Effectiveness of Selected Models Pre-registration Clinical Education. Final Report to the Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
  79. (1999). Evaluation of PACE program: Final report.
  80. (2006). Exemplars of mixed methods data combination and analysis.
  81. (1938). Experience and Education.
  82. (2004). Experiences of student nurses during clinical placement in psychiatric units in a hospital.
  83. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experiences as the Source of Learning and Development.
  84. (2006). Extrinsic and intrinsic work values: their impact on job satisfaction in nursing.
  85. (1997). Facilitating Learning in Clinical Settings.
  86. (2000). Feedback. I listened, reflected and utilised: Third year nursing students' perceptions of their clinical learning environment.
  87. (1985). Field work experience, Part II: the supervisor’s dilemma.
  88. (1995). Focus group as a qualitative method for cross-cultural research in social gerontology.
  89. (1997). Focus group data and qualitative analysis programs: Coding the moving picture as well as the snapshots. Sociological Research Online.
  90. (1990). Focus group interview: a research technique for informed nursing practice.
  91. (2003). Focus group methodology: explanatory notes for the novice research.
  92. (2004). Focus group research.
  93. (1999). Focus groups in health research: exploring the meanings of health and illness.
  94. (1997). Focus groups: their use in administration research.
  95. (1981). Formal models Vs human situational understanding: inherent limitations on the modeling of business enterprise. In B. Somekh, The contribution of action research to development in social endeavours: a position paper on action research methodology.
  96. (1984). From Novice to Expert: Excellence and Power in Clinical Practice. Menlo Park,
  97. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. 2 nd
  98. (1994). Helping preceptors mentor the next generation of nurse practitioners.
  99. (1997). Hit the ground running, The Graduate Year: Issues for the Nursing Profession.
  100. (2005). Hong Kong nursing students’ perception of the clinical environment: a questionnaire survey.
  101. (1988). Human Inquiry in Action,
  102. (1936). Ideology and utopia: an introduction to the sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan
  103. (1999). In pursuit of inter-agency collaboration in the public sector: what is the contribution of theory and research? Public Management: An
  104. (2002). Ingredients for change: revisiting a conceptual framework. Quality and Safety in Health Care,
  105. (2001). Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction.
  106. (1998). Introduction to Action Research. Thousand Oaks,
  107. (1979). Investigating reality in order to transform it: the Colombian experience.
  108. (2005). Inviting teaching behaviours of clinical faculty and nursing students’ anxiety.
  109. (1994). Issues in the organisation and structure of clinical education undergraduate nursing programs.
  110. (2000). Joint appointments in nurse education.
  111. (2001). Kaleidoscope: a 5-year action research project to develop nursing confidence in caring for patients with HIV disease in west India.
  112. (1996). Leading change.
  113. (2003). Learning for life.
  114. (1989). Learning from Experience: Principles and Practice of Action Research.
  115. (1998). Learning on clinical placement: the experience of six Australian nursing students.
  116. (2005). Learning to become a nurse: students’ reflection on their clinical experiences.
  117. (1994). Learning to nurse in the clinical setting.
  118. (1983). Learning to Nurse: Integrating Theory and Practice.
  119. (2003). Making inferences in mixed methods: The rules of integration.
  120. (1989). Making the model fit: theory and practice.
  121. (1988). Marginality and the role of the clinical teacher.
  122. (1995). Methodological triangulation in healthcare research.
  123. (2002). Models of Nursing Education and Training: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
  124. (1999). Multiple paradigms of nursing science.
  125. (2002). National Review of Nursing Education
  126. (2001). National Review of Nursing Education: Discussion Paper.
  127. (1993). New paradigm research in practice: the trials and tribulations of action research.
  128. (1978). Nurse teacher behaviours in the clinical field: apparent effect on nursing students’ learning.
  129. (1996). Nurse teachers’ clinical work: a survey report.
  130. (1992). Nurse teachers’ feelings about participating in clinical practice: an exploratory study.
  131. (1990). Nursing Clinical Teacher Effectiveness Inventory: a replication study of the characteristics of 'best' and 'worst' clinical teachers as perceived by nursing faculty and students,
  132. (2005). Nursing education and service collaboration: Making a difference in the Clinical Learning Environment.
  133. (1994). Nursing Education in Australian Universities. Report of the National review of
  134. (1997). Nursing students' and faculty's perceptions of the characteristics of 'best' and 'worst' clinical teachers: a replication study.
  135. (2002). Nursing students’ and clinical educators’ perceptions of characteristics of effective clinical educators in an Australian university school of nursing.
  136. (1993). Nursing students’ initial clinical experience: a phenomenological study.
  137. (1987). Nursing students’ perceptions of clinical experience.
  138. (2004). Nursing students’ perceptions of hospital learning environments: an Australian perspective.
  139. (2001). of Health and Welfare
  140. (2001). Organisational Change: a Review for Health Care Managers, Professionals and Researchers. National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Health Delivery and Organisation Research and Development, London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
  141. (1998). Participatory action research and the study of practice.
  142. (1994). Participatory action research: Issues in theory and practice.
  143. (1998). Perceptions of clinical role modelling: an exploration of nursing students' experiential learning.
  144. (2006). Perceptions of the learning environment in higher specialist training of doctors: implications for recruitment and retention.
  145. (1999). Practical skill development in new nurses.
  146. (1998). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: application to health research.
  147. (1991). Preceptorial students' view of their clinical experience,
  148. (1983). Preceptorship in nursing education.
  149. (2005). Preceptorship in nursing: An Irish perspective. Clinical Excellence for Nurse Practitioners,
  150. (1996). Preceptorship: a review of the literature.
  151. (2003). Principles of Mixed Methods and Multimethod Research Design.
  152. (2006). Professionalising action research – a meaningful strategy for modernising services?
  153. (1997). Project 2000: perceptions of the philosophy and practice of nursing: staffing perceptions – a new practitioner?
  154. (1997). Project to Review Expectations of Beginning Registered Nurses in the Workforce. Sydney: NSW Nurses' Registration Board.
  155. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks,
  156. (2003). Recognizing and rewarding nurse preceptors in critical care: Some answers.
  157. (1993). Reconstructing Teacher Education.
  158. (1989). Relationship between a preceptorship experience and role socialisation of graduate nurses.
  159. (1972). Report of the committee on nursing.
  160. (1995). Research Design and Statistical Analysis. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  161. (1997). Research Methods in Health.
  162. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy.
  163. (1990). Rewarding faculty preceptors.
  164. (1994). Selecting clinical preceptors for basic baccalaureate nursing students: a critical issue in clinical teaching.
  165. (1987). Skills in supervision.
  166. (2000). Staff and student relationships in a clinical practice model: Impact on learning.
  167. (1997). Staff nurse satisfaction and management style.
  168. (2000). Staffing of undergraduate clinical learning programs in Australia.
  169. (2000). Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. 5 th ed.
  170. (1986). Stress and social facilitation: the effects of the presence of an instructor on student nurses’ behaviour.
  171. (2000). Student and mentor perceptions of mentoring effectiveness.
  172. (2001). Student contributions to clinical agencies. Nursing and Health Care Perspectives,
  173. (2004). Student impressions of clinical nursing.
  174. (2001). Student placements in the nursing home setting,
  175. (1994). Student supervision: myth or reality?
  176. (2000). Students’ perceptions of field experience in professional development: A comparative study.
  177. (1989). Supervision in communication disorders.
  178. (2003). Supporting student nurses learning in and through practice: the role of the clinical guide.
  179. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspectives and Method.
  180. (1990). Teaching learning strategies.
  181. (1994). The best and the worst: student's experiences of clinical education.
  182. (1999). The case for combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in health services research.
  183. (1999). The challenge and promise of focus group.
  184. (2001). The challenges and conflicts of facilitating learning in practice: the experiences of two clinical educators.
  185. (1993). The changing role of the nurse teacher.
  186. (1998). The clinical experience of novice students in nursing.
  187. (1985). The clinical laboratory in nursing education. 2 nd ed.
  188. (2002). The clinical learning environment and supervision by staff nurses: developing the instrument.
  189. (1997). The clinical role of nurse teachers within a Project
  190. (1993). The clinical role of the nurse teacher in the United Kingdom.
  191. (1996). The clinical role of the nurse teacher: a review of the dispute.
  192. (1992). The clinical teaching partnership,
  193. (1995). The contribution of action research to development in social endeavours: a position paper on action research methodology.
  194. (1995). The development of a Clinical Learning Environment Scale.
  195. (1995). The effect of senior preceptorship on the adaptive competencies of community college nursing students.
  196. (1988). The effective clinical teacher: A role model.
  197. (1984). The effects of an undergraduate clinical internship on the self concept and role mastery of Baccalaureate nursing students.
  198. (1999). The effects of family nursing and family medicine clinical rotations on nursing and medical students’ self-efficacy for health promotion counselling.
  199. (1998). The handbook for focus group research. 2 nd ed.
  200. (1996). The lived experience of clinical educators,
  201. (2005). The lived experience of general students nurses on their first clinical placement: A phenomenological study. Nursing Education in Practice,
  202. (2001). The meaning of preceptorship: nurses' lived experience of being a preceptor.
  203. (1994). The methodology of focus group: the importance of interaction between participants.
  204. (1996). The nursing practice environment, staff retention and quality of care.
  205. (1991). The plight of clinical teaching in baccalaureate education.
  206. (2001). The point of triangulation.
  207. (1997). The preceptor model of clinical instruction: the lived experiences of students, preceptors and faculty-of-record.
  208. (1995). The Principles and Practice of Nurse Education. 3 rd ed. London: Chapman and Hall.
  209. (2000). The principles of learning.
  210. (1983). The qualitative research interview: a phenomenological and hermeneutical mode of understanding.
  211. (2002). The qualitative researcher’s companion. Thousand Oaks,
  212. (2000). The qualities of an effective mentor from the student nurse's perspective: findings from a longitudinal qualitative study.
  213. (2000). The reliability of measuring clinical performance using a competency based assessment tool: a pilot study.
  214. (2006). The role of mentors in supporting pre-registration nursing students.
  215. (2000). The role of qualitative research in broadening the ‘evidence base’ for clinical practice.
  216. (2002). The value of combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in nursing research by means of a method triangulation.
  217. (2005). The value of role modeling: perceptions of undergraduate and diploma nursing (adult) students.
  218. (1981). Toward effective and efficient use of the clinical laboratory.
  219. (2006). Towards sustainable models of clinical education in nursing: An ongoing conversation.
  220. (2000). Transforming negative work cultures: a practical strategy,
  221. (2005). Triangulation as a method for contemporary nursing research.
  222. (1998). Triangulation in nursing research: issues of conceptual clarity and purpose.
  223. (1993). Triangulation in qualitative research: evaluation of completeness and confirmation purposes.
  224. (1997). Triangulation of data collection: practicalities and problems in a study of informal carers of terminally ill cancer patients.
  225. (1991). Triangulation: operational definitions.
  226. (1995). Triangulation: the best of all worlds?
  227. (1997). Undergraduate nursing students’ perceptions of their clinical learning environment.
  228. (2006). Understanding Statistics in the Behavioural Sciences.
  229. (1996). Using triangulation in nursing research.
  230. (1983). Ward Learning Climate. Royal College of Nursing,
  231. (1986). What it takes to be a preceptor.
  232. (1996). What price nursing education? Kai Tiaki: Nursing New Zealand,
  233. (1995). Why things (sometimes) go wrong in focus groups.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.