Location of Repository

Using the knowledge management discourse as a framework for the self examination of a school administrator's professional practice

By Paul Joseph Dillon


Popular management literature routinely presents management discourses that offer managers with strategies or 'recipes' for organisational improvement. Practitioners often uncritically accept and implement strategies prescribed within these discourses. Management discourses are constantly evolving to seemingly provide newer and better solutions to organisations' problems. The evolutionary pressures are evidenced through the limited life spans of many of the strategies proffered in the various management discourses. So short have been the life spans of some of these management strategies that the question of faddism has been raised (Birnbaum, 2001). Over recent years knowledge management has filtered from the broader management discourse into the discourse of educational administration. Knowledge management practices are said to enable individuals within an educational organisation to add value to the information and knowledge that an organisation possesses. This research used self-study to examine the effectiveness of a school administrator attempting to model explicit knowledge management principles within his professional practice. A focus of the research was the critical investigation of knowledge management as a management fad or a framework for sustainable management behaviour. Employing the living theory approach to action research allowed me to ask questions about 'how' to improve my practice and to provide evidence to support my answers. It allowed me to examine my professional practice as an educational administrator who valued knowledge, its creation and use critically. My research learnings been have presented as propositions related to the 'how' of my professional practice and its influence on the creation and management of knowledge. The propositions are as follows. * Proposition 1: As an administrator my practices when working with knowledge are a reflection of my ontology and epistemology. To consciously vary my professional practices to facilitate knowledge creation and management it is essential for me to make my ontology and epistemology explicit. * Proposition 2: My professional practices related to information sharing and knowledge creation are directly influenced by psycho-social filters. Three primary psycho-social filters are context, need and relationships. * Proposition 3: The influence of the relationship filter on my knowledge creation activities is directly linked to the relationships that exist between me and those involved in the knowledge activities. The ongoing capacity for my professional practices to influence knowledge creation is linked through relationships by my personal resilience. * Proposition 4: My knowledge influencing practices are those practices that support the provision of opportunities for information sharing and the creation of knowledge with the specific intent of applying that knowledge in an organisational context. A primary application of the created knowledge is decision making. * Proposition 5: Knowledge creation is an ongoing process and knowledge is only relevant at a point in time and applicable in a particular context. * Proposition 6: My professional practices that influence information sharing, knowledge creation and decision making are explicit iterations of my power as an administrator. * Proposition 7: Involvement in the decision making process is one of my key roles as an administrator. Decision making is a major example of the creation and use of knowledge within a school. * Proposition 8: I acknowledge that stories are a valuable way for individuals to share information and they can act as a catalyst for the creation of knowledge. * Proposition 9: Using the knowledge management discourse as a framework to support the critique of my professional practice challenges its branding as a management fad. The propositions have been developed and tested through reconnaissance and two cycles of action research. These propositions have been integrated into a model representing my capacity as an administrator to influence the creation of knowledge

Topics: knowledge management, knowledge creation, management fads, living theory action research, practitioner investigations, research reconnaissance, professional practice, decision making, educational administration, educational leadership, organisational trust, psycho-social filters
Publisher: Queensland University of Technology
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.qut.edu.au:16346

Suggested articles



  1. (2004). A capability maturity model for knowledgebased decisionmaking.
  2. (1998). A Guide to ethical issues and action research.
  3. (1997). A new organizational structure.
  4. (1991). Action research for educational change.
  5. (2002). Action research for professional development, concise advice for new action researchers., 2004, from http://jeanmcniff.com/booklet1.html
  6. (2000). Action research in organisations.
  7. (1999). Action research: a pathway to action,knowledge and learning.
  8. (2004). Action research:understanding its philosophy can improve your practice. Retrieved 27/10/04, 2004, from http://www.uq.net.au/action_research/arp/philos.html
  9. (2002). Adaptive leadership: when change is not enough (part one).
  10. (1998). All you ever needed to learn about management in your MBA: But probably didn't.
  11. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform.
  12. (1995). Chaos, management and economics, the implications of non-linear thinking. St Leonards, UK: The Centre for Independent Studies Limited.
  13. (2002). Combining reflective practice and formal inquiry:an action research model.
  14. (2002). Complex acts of knowing:paradox and descriptive selfawareness.
  15. (1998). Conditions fostering organizational learning in schools.
  16. (2000). Confronting the assumptions underlying the management of knowledge: An agenda for understanding and investigating knowledge management.
  17. (1996). Consumption and identity at work.
  18. (2005). Course details. Retrieved 22/06/2005, 2005, from http://www.courses.qut.edu.au
  19. (1998). Creating community in reform: Images of organizational learning in inner city schools.
  20. (1994). Dialogue: The power of collective thinking. In
  21. (2002). Doctorates-converging or diverging patterns of provision.
  22. (1996). Emancipatory aspirations in a postmodern era. In O. Zuber-Skerrit (Ed.), New directions in action research
  23. (1999). Empowerment, coercive persuasion and organizational learning: do they connect? The Learning Organization,
  24. (1999). Evaluative inquiry for learning in organizations. Thousand Oaks,
  25. (1996). Exposing discourses through action research. In O. Zuber-Skerritt (Ed.), New directions in action research
  26. (1990). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood.
  27. (1998). From organizational learning to professional communities. In K. Leithwood & K. Louis (Eds.), Organizational learning in schools.
  28. (2001). General perspectives on knowledge management: Fostering a research agenda.
  29. (1996). Got a philosophical match? Does it matter? In O. ZuberSkerritt (Ed.), New directions in action research
  30. (1993). Handbook of individual differences: learning and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
  31. (2004). Harnessing the power of knowledge in higher education.
  32. (2000). Influences on knowledge processes in organizational learning:the psychosocial filter.
  33. (2000). Information dynamics, learning and knowledge creation in organisations.
  34. (1997). Intellectual capital.
  35. (2003). Introduction. In The trust process in organizations.
  36. (2002). Just-in-time knowledge management: Part 1.
  37. (2000). Knowledge generation in educational administration from inside out: The promise and perils of site-based, administrator research.
  38. (1999). Knowledge management : Background and key concepts.
  39. (2004). Knowledge management impacts on decision making process.
  40. (2001). Knowledge management meets future information users.
  41. (2001). Knowledge management systems and solutions for the school principal as chief learning officer.
  42. (1998). Knowledge, organisations and competition. In
  43. (1998). Leadership and other conditions which foster organizational learning in schools.
  44. (1998). Learning about organizational learning.
  45. (1997). Learning by knowledge -intensive firms.
  46. (1987). Lectures on the philosophical discourse of modernity.
  47. (2001). Management fads in Higher Education: where do they come from, what they do, why they fail.
  48. (1994). Managing organizational learning cycles. In
  49. (1978). Mind in society:the development of higher psychological processes.
  50. (2005). Multi-ontology sense making a new simplicity in decision making.
  51. (2001). Odd couple:Making sense of the curious concept of knowledge management.
  52. (1993). On dialogue, culture and organisational learning.
  53. (1993). On organisational learning.
  54. (1978). Organisational learning: A theory of action perspective.
  55. (1998). Organizational learning in schools: An introduction.
  56. (2000). Organizational learning:Debates past, present and future.
  57. (2005). Powerful public sector knowledge management:a school district example.
  58. (1990). Putting praxis into practice. Paper presented at the
  59. (1991). Qualitative methods in management research.
  60. (2000). Reconceptualizing research and scholarship in educational administration: Learning to know, knowing to do, doing to learn.
  61. (2001). Reinterpreting the learning organisation.
  62. (1996). Relexivity in emancipatory action research: Illustrating the researcher's constitutiveness. In
  63. (1995). Renewal in the age of paradox.
  64. (1991). Research methods for managers.
  65. (1998). School development and organizational learning: toward an integrative theory.
  66. (1993). Sculpting the learning organisation.
  67. (2000). SECI ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning,
  68. (1996). Short notes from the long history of happiness.
  69. (2001). Situated learning and the situated knowledge web: Exploring the ground beneath knowledge management.
  70. (2005). Solving a "WICKED" problem.
  71. (1996). Some principles and procedures for the conduct of action research.
  72. (2000). Strategic management and organisational dynamics (3rd ed.).
  73. (1999). Structuring for organizational learning.
  74. (1998). Struggles over the definition and practice of the educational doctorate in Australia.
  75. (1998). Successful knowledge management projects.
  76. (1994). Systemic quality management: Improving the quality of doing and thinking. In
  77. (1998). Teacher research: The question that persists.
  78. (1988). The action research planner.
  79. (1996). The cultures of management: The key to organizational learning.
  80. (2000). The DBA:What is it for?
  81. (1994). The end of bureacracy and the rise of the intelligent organization.
  82. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organisation.
  83. (2001). The information audit as a first step towards effective knowledge management.
  84. (1994). The knower and the known: The nature of knowledge in research on teaching. In
  85. (1997). The knowledge evolution expanding organizational intelligence.
  86. (2003). The knowledge you need, right when you need it.
  87. (1995). The knowledge-creating company.
  88. (2002). The knowledge:Karl-Erik Sveiby.
  89. (1997). The leadership triad:Knowledge, trust and power.
  90. (1997). The new organisational wealth. Managing and mesauring knowledge-based assets.
  91. (1999). The new paradigm wars: Is there room for rigorous practitioner knowledge in schools and universities?
  92. (2001). The paradox of control in organizations.
  93. (1996). The polotics of epistemologgy and the selfstudy of teacher education practices. Retrieved 28/06/2005, from hyyp://educ.queensu.ca/~ar/sstep1996/a_cole.htm Cousins,
  94. (1983). The reflective practitioner.
  95. (2001). The springboard:how storytelling ignites action in knowledge-era organizations.
  96. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions.
  97. (1976). The structure of unstructured decisions.
  98. (1966). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  99. (2003). The trust process.
  100. (1998). Tough questions on knowledge management. In
  101. (1996). Towards empowering leadership: The importance of imagining. In
  102. (1997). Transformational and adaptive learning within the learning organization: a framework for research and application.
  103. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning.
  104. (1996). Turning systems thinking on its head.
  105. (2001). Views of knowledge are human views.
  106. (2003). What counts as evidence in self-studies of teacher education practices? Retrieved 04-10, 2004, from http://www.bath.ac.uk/~edsajw/writings/evid.htm
  107. (1999). What is required for successful education reform? Learning from errors.
  108. (2001). Where did knowledge management come from?

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.