Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Applying CDA to the Analysis of Productive Hybrid Discourses in Science Classrooms

By Mary U. Hanrahan


Alienation from science has sometimes been linked to the dominant discourse practices of secondary science classrooms. Differences in primary language practice have been related to social class, which has been a major referent in the discussion of equity issues in education (cf. Bernstein, 2000; Bourdieu, 1974; Lankshear, 1994; Lankshear, Atweh, & Christensen, 1994; the New London Group, 1996). A mismatch between the expectations of educators and the primary language practices of the majority of students is seen as leading to a cycle of increasing disadvantage for already disadvantaged students. In some areas of the curriculum, mass education in recent decades has prompted empowering curriculum reform, with accompanying changes in pedagogic discourses, to accommodate the needs of students from a wide range of backgrounds and promote social justice. However, in secondary science education, with its tendency towards elitism (Lemke, 1990; O'Loughlin, 1992), evidence of such changes is harder to find. However, it does exist and I believe it should be highlighted. My current project will use CDA to explore challenges to the dominant discourse in teacher-student interactions in science classrooms (cf. Luke, 2002)

Topics: 130212 Science Technology and Engineering Curriculum and Pedagogy, 160809 Sociology of Education, 130106 Secondary Education, 200403 Discourse and Pragmatics, discourse analysis, CDA, research methodology, science education, alienation, equity, access, hybridity, teaching
Publisher: Australian Association for Research in Education
Year: 2002
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.