Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Globalization and productivity : a survey of firm-level analysis

By Kazunobu Hayakawa, Fukunari Kimura and Tomohiro Machikita


Recent empirical studies which utilize plant- or establishment-level data to examine globalization's impact on productivity have discovered many causal mechanisms involved in globalization's impact on firms' productivity. Since these pathways have been broad, there have been few attempts to summarize the several and detailed mechanisms of self-selection and learning at the same time. This paper examines seven pathways so that the clear-cut consequences of the broad picture of globalization become visible. This strategy is useful for detecting missing links within and across the existing studies as well as for finding possible synergy effects among different mechanisms. Insightful policy implications may be derived from the comprehensive comparisons between the seven different pathways of globalization

Topics: Firm-level data, Globalization, Productivity, International trade, Foreign investments, Developing countries, Developed countries, 335.5, C Developing countries 発展途上国, D Developed countries 先進国, F15 - Economic Integration, F23 - Multinational Firms; International Business
Publisher: 日本貿易振興機構アジア経済研究所
Year: 2010
DOI identifier: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00653.x
OAI identifier: oai:ir:2344/908

Suggested articles


  1. (2009). A two-dimensional analysis of the impact of outward FDI on performance at home: Evidence from Japanese manufacturing firms. Discussion papers 09053, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry. doi
  2. (2005). Absorptive capacity and productivity spillovers from FDI: a threshold regression analysis. doi
  3. (2001). Aggregate productivity growth: lessons from microeconomic evidence. In doi
  4. (2002). Alternative approaches to evaluation in empirical microeconomics. doi
  5. (2005). Are multinational enterprises more productive? A test of the selection hypothesis.
  6. (1993). Are there positive spillovers from direct foreign investment? Evidence from panel data for Morocco. doi
  7. (2002). Are there regional spillovers from FDI in the UK? In doi
  8. (1999). Attracting foreign manufacturing: investment promotion and agglomeration. doi
  9. (2007). Choice for FDI and post-FDI productivity. doi
  10. (2004). Choosing international linkage strategies in the electronics industry: the role of multinational experience. doi
  11. (2008). Collecting the Pieces of the FDI Knowledge Spillovers Puzzle. doi
  12. (2007). Comparative advantage and heterogeneous firms. doi
  13. (1998). Comparing wages, skills, and productivity between domestically and foreign-owned manufacturing establishments in the United States. In
  14. (2006). Cross-border acquisitions and target firms’ performance: evidence from Japanese firm-level data. doi
  15. (2007). Determinant factors of FDI spillovers - what do we really know? World Development doi
  16. (1999). Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. doi
  17. (2007). Do exporters have anything to learn from foreign multinationals? doi
  18. (2007). Do exports generate higher productivity? Evidence from Slovenia. doi
  19. (2003). Do productivity spillovers from Japanese and US FDI differ?
  20. (2006). Do stronger intellectual property rights increase international technology transfer? Empirical evidence from U.S. firm-level panel data. doi
  21. (2007). Does distance matter in spillover? doi
  22. (2004). Does exporting increase productivity? A microeconometric analysis of matched firms. doi
  23. (2004). Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. doi
  24. (2008). Does foreign ownership lead to higher firm productivity? doi
  25. (2009). Does offshoring pay? Firm-level evidence from Japan. Economic Inquiry, doi
  26. (2008). Does the country of origin of the acquiring firm impact performance?
  27. (2008). Domestic versus cross-border acquisitions: which impact on the target firms’ performance? doi
  28. (2003). Effects of environmental regulations on manufacturing plant births: Evidence from a propensity score matching estimator. doi
  29. (1983). Efficiency and productivity growth comparisons of European and U.S air carriers: A first look at the data. doi
  30. (2003). Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. doi
  31. (1999). Exceptional exporter performance: cause, effect, or both? doi
  32. (2005). Export behavior and firm productivity in German manufacturing: a firm-level analysis. doi
  33. (2004). Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms. doi
  34. (2005). Exporting and performance: evidence from Chilean plants. doi
  35. (2005). Exporting raises productivity in sub-Saharan African manufacturing firms. doi
  36. (2005). Exporting status and firm performance: evidence from a matched sample. doi
  37. (2008). Exporting, linkages and productivity spillovers from foreign direct investment. doi
  38. (2007). Exports and productivity: a survey of the evidence from firm-level data. The World Economy doi
  39. (2006). Exports, FDI, and productivity: dynamic evidence from Japanese firms. doi
  40. (2006). Factors determining the success or failure of Canadian establishments on foreign markets: A survival analysis approach. doi
  41. (2008). Firm Heterogeneity and Location Choice for Taiwanese Multinationals. doi
  42. (2009). Firm heterogeneity and the structure of U.S. multinational activity. doi
  43. (2007). Firm heterogeneity, exporting and foreign direct investment. doi
  44. (2008). Firm productivity and the foreign-market entry decision. Economics Working Paper No.
  45. (2007). Firm structure, multinationals, and manufacturing plant deaths. doi
  46. (2005). Firm survival and exit in response to trade liberalization. doi
  47. (2010). Firms in international trade: Importers and exporters heterogeneity in the Italian manufacturing industry. The World Economy doi
  48. (2008). Foreign acquisition and firm productivity: Evidence from Slovenia. The World Economy doi
  49. (2004). Foreign direct investment and productivity spillovers in Swedish manufacturing.
  50. (1999). Foreign direct investment R&D and spillover efficiency: evidence from Taiwan's manufacturing firms. doi
  51. (2003). Foreign direct investment, spillovers and absorptive capacity: evidence from quantile regressions. doi
  52. (2002). Foreign direct investment, transactions linkages, and the performance of the domestic sector. doi
  53. (2005). Foreign outsourcing and firm-level characteristics: evidence from Japanese manufactures. doi
  54. (2007). Foreign outsourcing, exporting, and FDI: a productivity comparison at the firm level. doi
  55. (2005). Gifted kids or pushy parents? Foreign acquisitions and plant performance in Indonesia. doi
  56. (2004). Global sourcing. doi
  57. (2003). Globalizing activities and the rate of survival: Panel data analysis on Japanese firms. doi
  58. (2008). Group on Exports and Productivity (ISGEP),
  59. (2010). Higher productivity in importing German manufacturing firms: Self-selection, learning from importing, or both? doi
  60. (2004). How different is Eastern Europe? Structure and determinants of location choices by French firms in Eastern and Western Europe. doi
  61. (2004). How do firms agglomerate? A study of FDI in France. doi
  62. (2009). How does FDI affect performance at home?: An activity-level analysis for Japanese electrical machinery and electronics firms.
  63. (2006). How does investing in cheap labour countries affect performance at home? France and Italy. doi
  64. (2009). Imports and exports at the level of the firm: Evidence from Belgium. The World Economy doi
  65. (2007). Improved access to foreign markets raises plant-level productivity ... for some plants. doi
  66. (2004). International technology diffusion. doi
  67. (2004). Investments abroad and performance at home: evidence from Italian multinationals.
  68. (1998). Is learning-by-exporting important? Micro-dynamic evidence from Colombia, Mexico and Morocco. doi
  69. (2002). Knowledge diffusion from multinational enterprises: the role of domestic and foreign knowledge-enhancing activities. doi
  70. (2006). Knowledge spillovers from foreign direct investment and the role of local R&D activities: evidence from Indonesia. doi
  71. (1996). Local technological capability and productivity spillovers from FDI in the Uruguayan manufacturing sector. doi
  72. (2008). Location choices of multinational firms in Europe: the role of EU cohesion policy. doi
  73. (2010). Location decision of heterogeneous multinational firms. doi
  74. (2004). Market potential and the location of Japanese investment in the European Union. The Review of doi
  75. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme.
  76. (2009). Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India. doi
  77. (2004). Much ado about nothing? Do domestic firms really benefit from foreign direct investment? The World Bank Research Observer doi
  78. (2001). Multinational Companies and Productivity Spillovers: A Meta-analysis. doi
  79. (2006). Multinationals, technology, and the introduction of varieties of goods. doi
  80. (1995). On productivity and plant ownership change: New evidence from the longitudinal research database. doi
  81. (2006). Optimal integration strategies for the multinational firm. doi
  82. (1982). Output, input and productivity using superlative index numbers. doi
  83. (2004). Outsourcing, foreign ownership, and productivity: Evidence from UK establishment-level data. doi
  84. (1999). Productivity growth in Indonesia: the role of regional characteristics and direct foreign investment. doi
  85. (2004). Productivity impacts and spillovers from foreign ownership in the United Kingdom. doi
  86. (1983). Productivity performance of U.S. trunk and local service airline in the era of deregulation. doi
  87. (2001). R&D and technology spillovers though FDI: innovation and absorptive capacity. doi
  88. (2010). Search-theoretic Approach to Securing New Suppliers: Impacts of Geographic Proximity for Importer and Non-importer.
  89. (2008). Self selection and post-entry effects of exports: evidence from Italian manufacturing firms. doi
  90. (2004). Self-selection, export market heterogeneity and productivity improvements: Firm level evidence from Slovenia. LICOS Discussion Papers 14804, LICOS - Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance,
  91. (2006). Survival of the best fit: exposure to low-wage countries and the (uneven) growth of U.S. manufacturing plants. doi
  92. (2008). Surviving globalisation. doi
  93. (2005). Technology transfer from acquisition FDI and the absorptive capacity of domestic firms: an empirical investigation. doi
  94. (2002). The causal effect of exports on firm size and labor productivity: first evidence from a matching approach. doi
  95. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. doi
  96. (2004). The determinants of survival of Spanish manufacturing firms. doi
  97. (1996). The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. doi
  98. (2006). The effects at home of initiating production abroad: evidence from matched French firms. doi
  99. (2007). The effects of multinational production on domestic performance: evidence from Japanese firms. RIETI Discussion Paper No.07-E-006.
  100. (2009). The impact of exporting on firm productivity: a meta-analysis of the learning-by-exporting hypothesis. doi
  101. (2005). The impact of inward FDI on local companies' labour productivity: Evidence from the Italian case. doi
  102. (2008). The impact of outward investments on parent company's employment and skill composition: evidence from the Italian case. doi
  103. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. doi
  104. (2010). The Impacts of Face-to-face and Frequent Interactions on Innovation: Upstream-downstream Relations. ERIA Discussion Paper Series No.
  105. (2007). The location of domestic and foreign production affiliates by French multinational firms. doi
  106. (2002). The location of Japanese investments in China: agglomeration effects, keiretsu, and firm heterogeneity. doi
  107. (2002). The productivity and wage effects of foreign acquisition in the United Kingdom. doi
  108. (2005). Trade and growth: Reconciling the macroeconomic and microeconomic evidence. doi
  109. (2006). Trade costs, firms and productivity. doi
  110. (2000). Understanding Productivity: Lessons from Longitudinal Microdata. doi
  111. (2008). Welfare gains from foreign direct investment through technology transfer to local suppliers. doi
  112. (2010). What Determines Productivity at the Micro Level? Forthcoming doi
  113. (2001). Who benefits from foreign direct investment in the UK? doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.