A History of the Binomial Classification of the Polynesian Native Dog


quarter of the eighteenth century to the present to give a binomial classification to the Poly-nesian native dog. Taxonomic interest has been expressed mainly by German and British natural scientists. Most of them, having neither seen a living Polynesian dog of unquestioned native breed nor studied skeletal material from a dog presumed to be of native breed, have had to de-pend on a few generalized descriptions by ex-plorers and settlers. Presented here are the taxonomists ' classifications and theories, the de-scriptions that they have cited, and the probable sources and dependability of any of their un-acknowledged information about the appearance of the Polynesian native dog. This paper results from my interest, mostly anthropological and mythological, in the Poly-nesian native dog. Polynesians in New Zealand, the Tuamorus, and the Hawaiian Islands narrate variants of a myth that the demigod Maul-of-a-thousand-tricks transformed a man he hated into a dog, the first known to them and a symbol of abhorred traits like gluttony, laziness, and incest. A story, entirely different from this, that Samoans and Tongans tell, of how Maui died when he attempted to kill a cave-dwelling, man-eating dog, is probably a post-European com-position since the dog was apparently absent from western Polynesia at the time of European discovery (Luomala, 1958). Polynesians had am-bivalent attitudes toward the dog, for it was both a symbol of the social outcast and a symbol of prestige that through its varied uses increased the status of its owner (Luomala, 1960). The dog was present at the time of European discovery of Polynesia in only a few archipela

Similar works

Full text

oai:CiteSeerX.psu: time updated on 11/1/2017

This paper was published in CiteSeerX.

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.