Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The concept of community governance: a preliminary review

By Vicky Totikidis, Anona Armstrong and Ronald Francis


An emerging model of governance gaining popularity within the public and community sectors is that of Community Governance. The concept usually refers to community participation, engagement and decision-making in public matters and is related to terms such as local governance, social governance, network governance and participatory governance. This paper provides a review of Australian and international literature related to the concept of community governance to assist understanding of the accumulating and sometimes confusing literature in this field. The paper begins with a workable definition of community governance, provides a discussion of some theoretical and historical aspects of ‘community’ from a community psychology perspective and presents an overview of the distinction between corporate, public and community governance to provide a context to the review. The remainder of the article presents the themes of: models and perspectives, network governance and community and community sector governance. A major conclusion is that community governance, by definition, is about community management and decision making but also implicates the broader aims of addressing community needs and building community capacity and well being

Topics: Centre for International Corporate Governance Research, 370000 Studies in Human Society, community governance, community psychology, public sector, community sector
Year: 2005
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2005). Beyond fragmented governance in the public sector', Beyond Fragmented Government: Governance in the Public Sector,
  2. (1998). Community governance, community leadership and the new local government, York Publishing Services,
  3. (1999). Community governance',
  4. (2005). Community Psychology: In pursuit of liberation and well-being, Palgrave MacMillan,
  5. (2002). Confrontation, Collaboration and Costs: Third Sector Participation in The Policy Process',
  6. (2005). Improving governance in higher education: An 'engaged university' perspective', Beyond Fragmented Government: Governance in the Public Sector,
  7. (1996). Local government and emerging models of participation in the Local Agenda 21 process.'
  8. (2005). Local Safety Committees and the Community Governance of Crime Prevention and Community Safety.' Beyond Fragmented Government: Governance in the Public Sector Conference,
  9. (1991). Markets, hierarchies and networks: the coordination of social life, London: Sage, in association with The Open University.
  10. (2000). New approaches to local democracy: Direct democracy, participation and the `third sector'.'
  11. (1998). Organic planning: A new approach to public participation in local governance.'
  12. (2001). Participatory governance in the future: Roles of the government and community sectors',
  13. (1999). Taking the Canterbury communities into the new millennium: The role of local government', Community Governance Forum, Christchurch Convention Centre,
  14. (2005). The Best of Times, the Worst of Times: Community Sector Advocacy in the Age of 'Compacts'', Beyond Fragmented Government: Governance in the Public Sector Conference,
  15. (1996). The New Governance: Governing without Government',
  16. (2004). The role of community governance in public sector programs and initiatives', Integrated Governance: Linking up Government, Business & Civil Society,
  17. (1999). Thinking about Local Government - Time to Change the Paradigm?' Future Times,
  18. (2004). Third Sector Participation in the Policy Process: A Framework for Comparative Analysis',
  19. (2005). Why a third sector roundtable?' website Philanthropy Australia, viewed 16 September,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.