Location of Repository

Changing Research Practices in the Digital Information and Communication Environment

By John Houghton, Colin Steele and Margaret Henty


In the context of the emerging knowledge-based economy, innovation and the capacity of the national innovation system to create and disseminate scientific and scholarly information are increasingly fundamental determinants of national prosperity. In their foundational work on National Innovation Systems, the OECD observed that prosperity in a knowledge economy depends as much, if not more, on the knowledge distribution power of the system than it does on its knowledge production power (OECD 1997, p43). This makes the infrastructure supporting research communication and collaboration, information search and access, and dissemination and publication a key element of the national innovation system. It is essential, therefore, to provide cost-effective access to, and dissemination of scientific and scholarly information in support of research and its economic, social and environmental applications.\ud \ud This study examines evolving research practices, focusing on how practices are changing and what the implications of those changes are for scholarly communication and the future development of the research infrastructure. It outlines a coherent agenda for the evolutionary development of a sustainable research information and scholarly communication infrastructure

Topics: 360000 Policy and Political Science, 280000 Information, Computing and Communication Sciences
Publisher: Department of Education, Science and Training
Year: 2003
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.vu.edu.au:456

Suggested articles



  1. (2003). (2001b) In Oldenburg’s Long Shadow: Librarians, Research Scientists, Publishers, and the Control of Scientific Publishing Washington:ARL. Available http://www.arl.org/arl/proceedings/138/guedon.html accessed
  2. (2002a) ‘Guest editorial: what do users want?’,
  3. (2003). (2002a) Australian ICT Trade Update 2002, Melbourne and Sydney: Centre for Strategic Economic Studies and Australian Computer Society. Available www.cfses.com accessed
  4. (2003). (2002b) Information Technology and the Revolution in Healthcare, Centre for Strategic Economic Studies, Victoria University: Melbourne. Available http://www.cfses.com/pharma.htm accessed
  5. (2002). A Framework for an Australian Research and Education Network,
  6. (2001). A Guide to the 2001 Research Assessment Exercise,
  7. (1999). A historian of books, lost and found in cyberspace,’
  8. (2001). A Tipping Point for Publishing Reform,’
  9. (1999). Academic Capitalism: politics, policies and the entrepreneurial university,
  10. (1998). Academic historians, electronic information access technologies and the World Wide Web: a longitudinal study of factors affecting use and barriers to that use’,
  11. (2003). Alternative Peer Review: quality managed for 21 st century scholarship’. Available http://www.public.iastate.edu/~gerrymck/APR-1.ppt accessed
  12. (2003). Analysis of the Legal Framework for Patent Ownership in Publicly Funded Research Institutions, Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training. Available www.dest.gov.au/highered/respubs/legal_framework/exec_summary.htm accessed
  13. (2002). Annual Report
  14. (1996). Australian science: Performance from published papers,
  15. (2002). Authors and Electronic Publishing, ALPSP 9. Available www.alpsp.org accessed
  16. (2002). Available http://www.alpsp.org/ accessed
  17. (2003). Available http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~chci/papers.html accessed
  18. (2003). Available www.infotoday.com/it/apr03/peek.shtml accessed
  19. (2002). Benchmarking Industry-Science Relationships,
  20. (2001). Beyond Core Journals and Licenses: the path to reform scientific publishing’.
  21. (2002). Changes in Academic Work: Implications for universities of the changing age distribution and work roles of academic staff, Department of Education, Science and Training. Available http://www.dest.gov.au/highered/ otherpub/academic_work.htm accessed
  22. (2003). Changes in Faculty Reading Behaviors: the impact of electronic journals on the University of Georgia’.
  23. (1999). Changing Academic Work: developing the learning university,
  24. (2000). Changing patterns of university-industry relations’,
  25. (2001). Comparing Innovation Systems: A Framework and Application to China’s Transitional Context,’ Research Policy.
  26. (1996). Computer mediated communication and publication productivity among faculty,’
  27. (2000). Connecting minds: Computer-mediated communication and scientific work,’
  28. (2002). Consortial Licensing vs Tradition: breaking up is hard to do’.
  29. (2001). Continuity and discontinuity: changing discourses of science in a market economy’,
  30. (2003). Could Peer Review Be Wrong?’
  31. (2001). Crisis and Transition: The Economics of Scholarly
  32. (1999). Cross-Disciplinary Research: A Discussion Paper, Australian Research Council Commissioned Report No. 61, ARC, Canberra. Available www.arc.gov.au/publications/arc_publications.htm accessed
  33. (2003). D-Lib Magazine 7(3). Available http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march01/frazier/03frazier.html accessed
  34. (2002). Digital collections, digital libraries and the digitization of cultural heritage information,’
  35. (2003). Digital Information Consumers, Players and Purchasers: information seeking behaviour in the new digital interactive environment’. Aslib Proceedings.
  36. (2002). Dimensions and Use of the Scholarly Information Environment,
  37. (2003). E-Just (2002a) E-Journal User Study Report of the Second Survey: the feature user survey. Available http://ejust.stanford.edu/findings2/report_survey2.html accessed
  38. (2003). E-Just (2002b) Research Findings. Available http://ejust.stanford.edu/findings3/3Survey Highlights.html accessed
  39. (2003). Economics Lesson Leads to Inspiration’
  40. (2000). Economics of Scholarly Communication, The Coalition for Innovation in Scholarly Communication, Canberra. Available www.caul.edu.au/cisc accessed
  41. (2000). Ed. The Credibility of Electronic Publishing, A report to the Humanities and Social Sciences Federation of Canada. Available http://web.mala.bc.ca/hssfc/Final/Credibility.htm accessed
  42. (2003). Editorial Peer Review for Improving the Quality of Reports of Biomedical Studies, Cochrane Collaboration.
  43. (2003). Editorial Peer Review for Improving the Quality of Reports of Biomedical Studies.
  44. (2002). Education Collaborative
  45. (1996). Electronic journals and scholarly communication: a citation and reference study, Paper presented at the Midyear Meeting of the American Society for Information Science,
  46. (2002). Electronic journals: user realities - the truth about content usage among the STM community,’
  47. (1997). Electronic Media and Scientific Communication: Opportunities, Complexities and Limitations,’ consultancy paper for OECD,
  48. (2001). et al (2001) A Revolution in RandD: The Impact of Genomics, Boston Consulting Group. Available www.bcg.com accessed
  49. et al (2003b) ‘Digital Journals, Big Deals, and Online Searching Behaviour: a pilot study’, Aslib Proceedings,
  50. (2002). Faculty attitudes toward electronic resources’,
  51. (2000). Forms of Research Organisation and Their Responsiveness to
  52. (1995). Frontiers of Knowledge,
  53. (1997). Generation and Distribution of Technological Knowledge: Incentives, Norms and Institutions,’
  54. (2002). Higher education at the crossroads: an overview paper,
  55. (2001). Historians and Electronic Resources: A Second Citation Analysis,
  56. (2003). How Academics Want to Protect their Openaccess Research Papers. Available http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/ls/ disresearch/romeo accessed
  57. (2000). How much information?,
  58. (1997). How much is collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model,
  59. (1998). Indicators for Systems of Innovation: a bibliometrics-based approach, IDEA Paper 12,
  60. (2002). Information Infrastructure Framework for Australian
  61. (2003). Information Needs of QUT Researchers: a report on focus group research,
  62. (2001). Innovation and the Developing System of Knowledge Production,’ paper presented at Centre for Policy
  63. (2003). Institutional Repositories: Essential Infrastructure for Scholarship
  64. (2000). Inventing our future: The links between Australian patenting and basic science, Canberra: ARC and CSIRO.
  65. (2001). Issues for Science and Engineering Researchers in the Digital Age, Office of Special Projects, Policy and Global Affairs, National Research Council, Washington D.C.: National Academy Press. Available www.nap.edu/html/issues_digital/notice.html accessed
  66. (2001). JISC/DNER E-Book Working Group Shaping a strategy for e-books: an issues paper, JISC/DNER E-Book Working Group. Available http://www.jisc.ac.uk/dner/ebooks/strategy1.html accessed
  67. (2003). K.et al.(2003) 'Trends in use of electronic journals in higher education in the UK-views of academic staff and students,' D-Lib Magazine, 9 (6). Available HTTP://www.dlib.org/dlib/june03/urquhart/06urquhart.html accessed
  68. (2002). Knowledge about knowledge since Nelson and Winter: a mixed record, SPRU Working Paper No 83,
  69. (1999). Knowledge and Innovation: A policy statement on research and research training, Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Canberra. Available www.dest.gov.au/archive/highered/whitepaper/default.asp accessed
  70. (2003). Knowledge production, consumption and impact: policy indicators for a changing world, Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives
  71. (1996). Knowledge-based cooperation: University-Industry linkages in Australia,
  72. (2002). Mastering the Knowledge Network -
  73. (2001). Minotaur: Six Proposals for Freeing the Refereed Literature Online:
  74. (2001). Mode 2 Knowledge Production in the Field of Management,
  75. (1997). National Innovation Systems,
  76. (2000). Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication,
  77. (1998). On the Brink: Australia's Universities Confronting Their Future,
  78. (2003). Open Access: restoring scientific communication to its rightful owners,
  79. (2003). Open Archives and Other Technologies: a pilot study on scientist’s perception’. Available http://www.sissa.it/~marco/ws.html accessed
  80. (2002). Perspectives on the Crisis of the University,’ in
  81. (2003). Phoenix Rising: new models for the research monograph,’
  82. (2002). Post-Intellectuality? Universities and the Knowledge Industry,’
  83. (2003). Prospects for institutional e-print repositories in the United Kingdom, UKOLN, ePrints UK supporting study
  84. (2002). Reading behaviour and electronic journals,’
  85. (2000). Real Science, Cambridge:
  86. (2002). Reconfiguring the humanities, National Institute of the Humanities, Australian National University. Available arts.anu.edu.au/nih/iandonaldson_notes.pdf accessed
  87. (1997). Research and the New Universities: Towards Mode 2,’ ATSE Focus No 98,
  88. (2002). Research Training in Doctoral Programs: What can be learned from professional doctorates?
  89. (2002). Researchers’ Use of Libraries and other Information Sources: current patterns and future trends, Research Support Libraries Group. Available http://www.rslg.ac.uk/research/libuse/ accessed
  90. (2003). Review of Research Assessment: Report by Sit Gareth Roberts to the UK funding bodies,
  91. (2003). Review queries usefulness of peer review,’ The Scientist,
  92. (2003). Revolutionizing Science and Engineering Through Cyberinfrastructure, National Science Foundation, Arlington. Available www.cise.nsf.gov accessed
  93. (1999). Scholarly Electronic Publishing in the Humanities and Social Sciences in Canada: a study of the transformation of knowledge communication. Available http://ahdp.lib.ucalgary.ca/hssfc accessed
  94. (2002). Scholars and Entrepreneurs: The Universities in Crisis,
  95. (2002). Science and Engineering Indicators
  96. (1997). Science-based Technologies and Interdisciplinary: Challenges for Firms and Policy,’
  97. (2002). Scientific Publishing: knowledge is power. Available http://www.econ.ucsb.edu/~tedb/Journals/morganstanley.pdf accessed
  98. (2002). Seizing the Moment: scientists authorship rights in the digital age’.
  99. (2002). Serial Killers: how great is the e-print threat to periodical publishers,’
  100. (2002). SPARC Institutional Repository Checklist and Resource Guide, Washington DC, Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC). Available and http://www.arl.org/sparc/IR/IR_Guide.html accessed
  101. (2002). Straddling the humanities and social sciences: The research process of music scholars,
  102. (2001). The battle to define the future of the book in the digital world,’
  103. (2001). The book is dead: citation rates in the humanities and social sciences, Available http://library.caltech.edu/john/charleston2001/charleston-text.pdf accessed
  104. (2002). The Case for Institutional Repositories: A SPARC position paper,
  105. (2000). The Challenge of Building Infrastructure in the Social Sciences,’ Social Sciences for a Digital World: Building Infrastructure and Databases for the Future, OECD, Paris. Available www.oecd.org accessed
  106. (1995). The changing print resource base of academic libraries in the United States’,
  107. (2001). The continuing behavioural modification of academics since the
  108. (2002). The Data Deluge: An e-Science Perspective,
  109. (1999). The economics of knowledge production: funding and the structure of university knowledge,
  110. (1998). The endless transition: a ‘Triple Helix” of University-Industry-Government relations’,
  111. (2000). The Enterprise University: power, governance and reinvention in Australia,
  112. (2001). The Faustian Grip of Academic Publishing. Available http://econwpa.wustl.edu:8089/eps/mic/papers/0202/0202005.pdf accessed
  113. (2002). The funding of research and research training in Australian universities: A response to the Commonwealth Department
  114. (2002). the Future (2002) Core Scholarly Information Tasks and E-Journal Features: Expanded Discussion, Stanford University Libraries, Highwire Press. Available http://ejust.stanford.edu/findings/interview_coretasks.pdf accessed
  115. (2001). The Future of Research: What is the Role of the University?, Report of the Faculty of Medicine conference, Trolleholm:
  116. (1998). The Global Research Village: How Information and
  117. (2003). The Impact of Copyright Ownership on Academic Author Self-archiving. Available http://www.lboro.ac.uk/ departments/ls/disresearch/romeo/ accessed
  118. (2002). The information work of interdisciplinary humanities scholars: exploration and translation,
  119. (1996). The Knowledge
  120. (2001). The Librarians’ Dilemma. Contemplating the costs of the “Big Deal”’.
  121. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies,
  122. (2002). The Open Archives Initiative,
  123. (2002). The Peer Review Process: a report to the JISC Scholarly Communications Group, JISC. Available http://www.jisc.ac.uk/jcie/scg/peerreview.pdg accessed
  124. (1999). The Place of Universities in the System of Knowledge Production, Montreal: Observatoire des sciences et des technologies. Available www.ost.qc.ca accesses
  125. (2003). The Processed Book’. Firstmonday 8(3). Available http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue8_3/esposito/index.html accessed
  126. (2002). The rapid evolution of scholarly publishing,
  127. (1999). The rush to technology: a view from the humanists’,
  128. (2001). The Systems of Innovation Approach and Innovation Policy: An account of the state of the art,’
  129. (1958). The Trend Toward Multiple Authorship in
  130. (2002). The Triple Helix of University – Industry – Government: Implications for Policy and Evaluation,’ Working paper 2002-11, Stockholm: SISTER. Available www.sister.nu accessed
  131. (2001). The Triple Helix. Available http://www.mindspring.com/~cwjordan/ triplehelix.html accessed
  132. (2003). The UCLA Internet Report: Surveying the Digital Future, UCLA Center for Communication Policy. Available www.ccp.ucla.edu accessed
  133. (2003). The University of California collection management initiative: a study of behavior and attitudes of people using electronic journals,'
  134. (1996). The Virtual College:
  135. (2002). The voice of the user: where students and faculty go for information, Paper presented at Educause
  136. (2002). Towards a Politics of the Enterprise University,’ in
  137. (2000). Towards electronic journals: realities for scientists, librarians and publishers, Special Libraries Association,
  138. (1995). Tragic Loss or Good Riddance?’
  139. (2003). Transcending the Material: the Library of the 21 st Century, Turnbull Founder Lecture,
  140. (2003). Turning Science into Business: Patenting and licensing at public research organisations,
  141. (1997). Universities and the global knowledge economy: a triple helix of university-industry-government relations,
  142. (2002). Use of electronic resources in scholarly electronic journals: a citation analysis,’
  143. (2002). Use patterns of print and electronic journals, Paper presented at the Fiesole Collection Development Retreat Series
  144. (1999). What Authors Want: The ALPSP research study on the motivations and concerns of contributors to learned journals, ALPSP. Available www.alpsp.org/pub1.htm accessed
  145. (2003). What do Authors Really Care About?-What 50,000 STM authors tell us each year,' Presentation at the Fiesole Collection Development Retreat Series Five
  146. (2001). What do faculty think of electronic resources?, JSTOR. Available http://www.jstor.org/about/faculty.survey.ppt accessed
  147. (2003). What We Know About Academic Users'. ALPSP Seminar. Learning From Users,
  148. (2003). What will happen to peer review?’
  149. (2001). Whatever Happened to the Ivory Tower?’. Cited by
  150. (1999). Who Needs Cultural Research?’ CHCI Working Papers,
  151. (2002). Zetoc Evaluation Report. Available http://zetoc.mimas.ac.uk/question.html accessed

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.