Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Taking the LEED? Analyzing spatial variations in market penetration rates of eco-labeled properties

By Franz Fuerst, C. Kontokosta and Patrick McAllister

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of policies to promote the adoption of LEED-certified buildings across CBSA in the United States. Drawing upon a unique database that combines data from a large number of sources and using a number of regression procedures, the determinants of the proportion LEED-certified space for more than 170 CBSA in the US is modeled. LEED-certified space still accounts for a relatively small proportion of commercial stock in all markets. The average proportion is less than 1%. There is no conclusive evidence of a positive impact of policy intervention on the levels of LEED-certified space. However, after accounting for bias introduced by non-random assignment of policies, we find preliminary evidence of a positive impact of city-level green building incentives. There is a significant positive association between market size and indicators of economic vitality on proportions of LEED-certified space

Publisher: University of Reading
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:centaur.reading.ac.uk:22723

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1994). Agglomeration and Industrial Location: An Econometric Analysis of Japanese‐affiliated Manufacturing Establishments in Automotive‐related Industries,
  2. (2001). Assisted Housing and Residential Segregation: The Role of Race and Ethnicity in Siting of Assisted Housing Developments,
  3. (2009). Building Momentum: An Analysis of Investment Trends in LEED and Energy-Star-Certified Properties.
  4. (1985). Business Location Decisions in the United States: Estimates of the Effects of Unionization, Taxes, and Other Characteristics of States,
  5. (2008). Does Green Pay Off?
  6. (2010). Doing Well By Doing Good? Green Office Buildings,
  7. (2006). End-Use Energy Efficiency in a PostCarbon’California Economy: Policy Issues and Research Frontiers, in Managing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in
  8. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies,
  9. (2009). Green Buildings and Productivity,
  10. (2010). Green Design and the Market for Commercial Office Space.
  11. (2010). Green on Buildings: The Effects of Municipal Policy on Green Building Designations in America‘s Central Cities,
  12. (2010). Income, Value and Returns in Socially Responsible Office Properties. Working Paper,
  13. (2008). LEED's Big Market Bias. CoStar Research News.
  14. (2000). Location Determinants of New Foreign‐Owned Manufacturing Plants,
  15. (2008). Locational Patterns of Low‐Income Housing Tax Credit Developments: A Sociospatial Analysis of Four Metropolitan Areas,
  16. (2004). Siting Affordable Housing: Location and Neighborhood Trends of Low Income Housing Tax Credit Developments in the 1990s, The Brookings Institution Census
  17. (1993). Spurious Agglomeration,
  18. (2009). The Effect of State and City Green Policies on the Market Penetration of Green Commercial Buildings,
  19. (2007). The Greening of U.S. Investment Real Estate – Market Fundamentals, Prospects and Opportunities.
  20. (1986). The Statistical Analysis of Quasi-Experiments,
  21. (2011). Which ―Greenness‖ is Valued? Evidence from Green Condominiums in Tokyo. Paper presented at Green Building Finance and Investments: Practice, Policy and Research,
  22. (2009). Why Do Companies Rent Green? A Model of Ecological Responsiveness,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.