Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Exploring the structuration of corporate responsibility: current ideas from an action research study.

By Julia N. Mills, Paul Hooper and Mark A. Stubbs

Abstract

Paper presented at the BSE Conference, 2005, September 4-6, 2005, Leeds. Full-text is available at http://www.crrconference.org/downloads/mills.pdf

Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:www.e-space.mmu.ac.uk:2173/84297

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2002). A structuration view on the initiation of environmental reports. doi
  2. (1946). Action research and minority problems. doi
  3. (2002). Action research: action and research http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/arp/aandr.html [3
  4. (2002). Business Action Research in Practice - A Strategic Conversation About Conducting Action Research in Business Organisations. Systematic Practice and doi
  5. (1997). Cannibals with Forks. The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone, doi
  6. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory. doi
  7. (2005). Comparing appreciative inquiry to action research: 00 practitioner perspectives.
  8. (2002). Doing action research in one's own organisation: An ongoing conversation over time. Systematic Practice and Action Research,
  9. (1999). Don't fix that company! Training
  10. (1996). How corporate social responsibility pays off. doi
  11. (2000). Keynote lecture: Evaluating action research.
  12. (1993). New paradigm research in practice: the trials and tribulations of action research. doi
  13. (1976). New Rules of Sociological Method. doi
  14. (2002). Occupational Health and Safety Systems, Corporate Governance and Viable Systems Diagnosis: An Action Research Approach. Systematic Practice and Action Research,
  15. (1984). The Constitution of Society. doi
  16. (2001). The social dimensions of business excellence. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.