Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Biochemical characterization of the Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC) complex from Bacillus subtilis

By Arsen Volkov


Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC) proteins play a key role in the chromosome dynamics throughout the cell cycle in almost all species from bacteria to eukaryotes. Proteins from SMC family are involved in a number of processes, such as chromosomes condensation and segregation, sister-chromatid cohesion and DNA double strand break repair. All SMC proteins share a typical structure and consist of N- and C-terminal domains carrying the ATPase motif, the hinge domain and two central coiled-coil domains. Terminal domains come together to form one head domain, while coiled coil domains form a single coiled coil. SMC proteins form an intermolecular dimer via interaction of hinge domains. All eukaryotic SMCs perform their function in complex with a number of other none SMC subunits and recently, two novel prokaryotic proteins, ScpA and ScpB, have been found to interact with bacterial SMC in vivo. In this work, biochemical studies were performed to understand the properties of B. subtilis SMC, ScpA and ScpB in vitro, and to elucidate the mechanism of their action in vivo. The main state of ScpB in solution was found to be a dimer, while ScpA exists in both monomeric and dimeric forms. Using different approaches, such as size exclusion chromatography, gel shift assay and sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation, I found that SMC, ScpA and ScpB indeed form a ternary complex, which most likely consists of one SMC dimer, two ScpAs and two ScpB dimers. ScpA and ScpB were also able to form two types of complexes in absence of SMC: one formed by one ScpA and a dimer of ScpB, and a larger complex most likely consisting of two ScpAs and two ScpB dimers. ScpB was shown to interact with SMC indirectly only in presence of ScpA, and ScpA interacted stably with the SMC head domains only in the presence of ScpB. In addition, gel filtration assays suggested that the SMC complex is most likely formed by direct binding of the ScpA/ScpB complex to SMC, rather than through binding of individual ScpA and ScpB molecules to SMC. Sucrose gradient analysis also showed that ScpA, ScpB and SMC are present as a complex as well as in non-complexed form, indicating that the SMC complex is in a dynamic state in vivo. Another aspect investigated here were the DNA binding properties of SMC, ScpA, ScpB as well as of different domains of SMC. I found that neither ScpA, nor ScpB are required for binding of SMC to DNA, and that they have no affinity to DNA in absence of SMC. Isolated hinge and head domains of SMC were also unable to bind DNA, thus, the complete SMC molecule is needed for proper function. SMC bound to dsDNA in a sequence independent manner, and based on data obtained from surface plasmon resonance experiments, binding to DNA occurred via formation of a closed ring-like structure. The data suggest that SMC interacts with DNA via dimerization of its head domains leading to the formation of a ring-like structure with DNA trapped in between the coiled-coil (domains) arms of SMC. Collaborative AFM studies have also shown ring formation by SMC, and large complex structures formed by SMCs were detected in solution that could explain why SMCs in bacterial cells are concentrated in certain regions of the cells (foci) and are not distributed (throughout the inner cellular space) all over the chromosome. Mutagenesis studies were another part of the project. SMC proteins have a weak ATPase activity and head domains contain conserved motifs that are typical for ABC-type ATPases. In this work I have shown, that ATP binding, but not ATP hydrolysis, is required for DNA binding of SMC. Additionally, none of these activities were required for complex formation with ScpA and ScpB, although formation of the SMC complex was less efficient in the mutant proteins. A model is suggested that ATP binding induces dimerization of head domains causing formation of a ring by SMC with DNA locked in the middle. Data obtained from gel filtration studies suggest that ScpA, in absence of ScpB, causes DNA release from SMC, while in the presence of ScpB, all three proteins form a stable complex. Therefore the condensation state of chromosomes in vivo could possibly be controlled by the levels of ScpB in the cell

Topics: chromosome condensation ; SMC ; Segregation ; Bacillus ; segregation ; Chomosomenkondesation ; Life sciences, chromosome condensation -- SMC -- SMC -- Segregation -- Bacillus -- Bacillus -- segregation -- Biowissenschaften, Biologie -- Chomosomenkondesation, ddc:570
Publisher: Philipps-Universität Marburg, Fachbereich Biologie
Year: 2004
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2001). A Caenorhabditis elegans cohesion protein with functions in meiotic chromosome pairing and disjunction." doi
  2. (1999). A central role for cohesins in sister chromatid cohesion, formation of axial elements, and recombination during yeast meiosis." doi
  3. (1997). A direct link between sister chromatid cohesion and chromosome condensation revealed through the analysis of MCD1 in S. cerevisiae." doi
  4. (1994). A heterodimeric coiled-coil protein required for mitotic chromosome condensation in vitro." doi
  5. (2003). A model for ATP hydrolysis-dependent binding of cohesin to DNA." doi
  6. (2000). A novel SMC protein complex in Schizosaccharomyces pombe contains the Rad18 DNA repair protein." doi
  7. (2003). A prokaryotic condensin/cohesin-like complex can actively compact chromosomes from a single position on the nucleoid and binds to DNA as a ring-like structure. Mol Cell Biol. doi
  8. (2003). A prokaryotic condensin/cohesin-like complex can actively compact chromosomes from a single position on the nucleoid." doi
  9. (2001). A role for Drosophila SMC4 in the resolution of sister chromatids in mitosis." doi
  10. (1992). ABC transporters: from microorganisms to man." doi
  11. (2003). ATP hydrolysis is required for cohesin's association with chromosomes." doi
  12. (1998). ATP-dependent aggregation of single-stranded DNA by a bacterial SMC homodimer." doi
  13. (1997). ATP-dependent positive supercoiling of DNA by 13S condensin: a biochemical implication for chromosome condensation." doi
  14. (2001). Bimodal activation of SMC ATPase by intra- and inter-molecular interactions." doi
  15. (1997). Bipolar localization of the replication origin regions of chromosomes in vegetative and sporulating cells of B. subtilis." doi
  16. (2003). Building and breaking bridges between sister chromatids." doi
  17. (2002). C. elegans condensin promotes mitotic chromosome architecture, centromere organization, and sister chromatid segregation during mitosis and meiosis." doi
  18. (2003). Chromosomal cohesin forms a ring." doi
  19. (2001). Chromosome condensation by a human condensin complex in Xenopus egg extracts." doi
  20. (2000). Cleavage of cohesin by the CD clan protease separin triggers anaphase in yeast." doi
  21. (2002). Cohesin release is required for sister chromatid resolution, but not for condensin-mediated compaction, at the onset of mitosis." doi
  22. (2001). Composite active site of an ABC ATPase: MutS uses ATP to verify mismatch recognition and authorize DNA repair."
  23. (2002). Condensin and cohesin display different arm conformations with characteristic hinge angles." doi
  24. (2003). Condensin and cohesin: more than chromosome compactor and glue." doi
  25. (2002). Condensin architecture and interaction with DNA: regulatory non-SMC subunits bind to the head of SMC heterodimer."
  26. (1997). Condensins, chromosome condensation protein complexes containing XCAP- C, XCAP-E and a Xenopus homolog of the Drosophila Barren protein." doi
  27. (1998). Crystal structure of the ATP-binding subunit of an ABC transporter."
  28. (1996). Cut2 proteolysis required for sisterchromatid seperation in fission yeast." doi
  29. (2003). Differential contributions of condensin I and condensin II to mitotic chromosome architecture in vertebrate cells." doi
  30. (2000). Disjunction of homologous chromosomes in meiosis I depends on proteolytic cleavage of the meiotic cohesin Rec8 by separin." doi
  31. (1995). Displacement of sequence-specific transcription factors from mitotic chromatin." doi
  32. (1999). Disruption of mRad50 causes embryonic stem cell lethality, abnormal embryonic development, and sensitivity to ionizing radiation." doi
  33. (2001). Disseminating the genome: joining, resolving, and separating sister chromatids during mitosis and meiosis." doi
  34. (1994). DPY-27:a chromosome condensation protein homolog that regulates C. elegans dosage compensation through association with the X chromosome." doi
  35. (2000). Dual roles of the 11S regulatory subcomplex in condensin functions." doi
  36. (2002). Efficient supercoiling of DNA by a single condensin complex as revealed by electron spectroscopic imaging." doi
  37. (1999). Fission yeast condensin complex: essential roles of non-SMC subunits for condensation and cdc2 phosphorylation of Cut3/SMC4." doi
  38. (2001). Fluorescent imaging in living systems." doi
  39. (1991). Genetic competence in Bacillus subtilis." doi
  40. (2004). Graumann PL ATP binding is required for DNA binding activity of Bacillus subtilis SMC, but not for complex formation with ScpA and ScpB. Submitted Feb
  41. (2000). HEAT repeats associated with condensins, cohesins, and other complexes involved in chromosome-related functions." doi
  42. (2002). Identification of a novel non-structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) component of the SMC5-SMC6 complex involved in DNA repair." doi
  43. (1998). Identification of Xenopus SMC protein complexes required for sister chromatid cohesion." doi
  44. (2003). Kleisins: a superfamily of bacterial and eukaryotic SMC protein partners." doi
  45. (2002). Molecular architecture of SMC proteins and the yeast cohesin complex." doi
  46. (2000). Mre11 and Rad50 from Pyrococcus furiosus: cloning and biochemical characterization reveal an evolutionarily conserved multiprotein machine." doi
  47. (2000). NPS@: Network Protein Sequence Analysis." doi
  48. (2001). Pre-meiotic S phase is linked to reductional chromosome segregation and recombination."
  49. (1991). Protein Structure. Useful calculations for thinking about protein structure at the nanometer level.
  50. (1999). Rad18 is required for DNA repair and checkpoint responses in fission yeast." doi
  51. (2000). Sex in the wormcounting and compensating X-chromosome dose."
  52. (1999). Sister-chromatid separation at anaphase onset is promoted by cleavage of the cohesin subunit Scc1."
  53. (1995). Structural and functional similarities between the SbcCD proteins of Escherichia coli and the RAD50 and MRE11 (RAD32) recombination and repair proteins of yeast." doi
  54. (2002). Structure-function relationship and regulation of two Bacillus subtilis DNA-binding proteins, HBsu and AbrB."
  55. Tainer (2003). "Rad50/SMC proteins and ABC transporters: unifying concepts from high-resolution structures." doi
  56. (2002). Tethering on the brink: the evolutionarily conserved Mre11-Rad50 complex." doi
  57. (2004). The ABC transporter structure and mechanism: perspectives on recent research." doi
  58. (1997). The anaphase inhibitor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pds1p is a target of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway." doi
  59. (2002). The dissociation of cohesin from chromosomes in prophase is regulated by Polo-like kinase." doi
  60. (2004). The evolution of SMC proteins: phylogenetic analysis and structural implications." doi
  61. (2002). The many functions of SMC proteins in chromosome dynamics." doi
  62. (1995). The rad18 gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe defines a new subgroup of the SMC superfamily involved in DNA repair."
  63. (2003). Transcription factor as a topological homeostat." doi
  64. (1999). Yeast cohesin complex requires a conserved protein, Eco1p(Ctf7), to establish cohesion between sister chromatids during DNA replication." doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.