Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Engaging science : pre-service primary school teachers' notions of engaging science lessons.

By D.P. Newton and L.D. Newton


If children are engaged in science lessons, their learning is likely to be better and, in the long term, careers in science and technology will remain open. Given that attitudes can develop early and be difficult to change, it is important for teachers of younger children to know how to foster engagement in science. This study identified what a cohort of 79 pre-service teachers in England considered to be engaging elementary science lessons and compared their notions with teacher behaviours known to be conducive to engagement. First, all brought beliefs about how to engage children in science lessons to their training. They tended to favour children’s hands-on activity as an effective means of fostering attentive participation in learning, although many had additional ideas. Nevertheless, the means and ends of their ‘pedagogies of engagement’ tended to be simple and narrow. Trainers need to ensure that notions of engagement are wide enough to cope with a variety of teaching situations, as when hands-on experience is not feasible, effective or appropriate. At the same time, teachers will need to recognise that one approach may not suit all learners. Without this, there is the risk that they will lack the skills to engage children in science. Nevertheless, these beliefs could offer a useful starting point for trainers who wish to widen pre-service teachers’ conceptions of engagement and increase their repertoire of teaching behaviours

Topics: Fostering engagement in science, Pedagogies of engagement, Teachers' conceptions.
Publisher: Springer
Year: 2011
DOI identifier: 10.1007/s10763-010-9244-1
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2008). A Practical Guide to Teaching Science in the Secondary School.
  2. (2003). Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications.
  3. (2003). Children‟s perceptions of school science.
  4. (2000). Developing and acting upon one‟s conception of the nature of science: a follow up study.
  5. (2007). Effectiveness of the teaching for understanding curriculum model in enhancing students‟ engaged learning.
  6. (2005). Facts and myths about pedagogies of engagement in science learning.
  7. (1988). Higher order thinking in high school social studies.
  8. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis.
  9. (2009). Knowledge development at the time of use.
  10. (1988). Making science education relevant. London: Kogan Page. Teachers‟ notions of engaging science
  11. (1981). Phenomenography – describing conceptions of the world around us.
  12. (2005). Primary horizons: starting out in science. London: Wellcome Trust.
  13. (2007). Promoting student engagement in science: interaction rituals and the pursuit of a community of practice.
  14. (2001). Public understanding of science at the crossroads.
  15. (1981). Pupil engagement in learning tasks: a fertile area for research in science teaching.
  16. (2008). Science boosterism versus public engagement with science.
  17. (2006). Science in a social context.
  18. (2006). Science in education: implications for formal education? In
  19. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: patterns in elementary, middle and high school years.
  20. (2002). Teacher praise and feedback and students‟ perceptions of the classroom environment.
  21. (1992). Teachers‟ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct.
  22. (2006). Teachers‟ notions of engaging science
  23. (2004). Teaching Tricky Science Concepts.
  24. (2005). The art of engagement.
  25. (1990). The dynamics of curriculum change.
  26. (2004). The impact of teachers‟ perceptions of student characteristics on the enactment of their beliefs,
  27. (2007). What are effective strategies to support student engagement and learning? Master of Teaching thesis,
  28. (2002). What students think: college students describe their high school chemistry class.
  29. (2002). What we think we can safely say …‟: primary teachers‟ views of the nature of science,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.