Location of Repository

Issues That Should Not Be Overlooked in the Dominance Versus Ideal Point Controversy

By Anna Brown and Alberto Maydeu-Olivares
Topics: HA
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:kar.kent.ac.uk:29631

Suggested articles



  1. (2010). 75 Years After Likert: Thurstone Was Right! doi
  2. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. doi
  3. (2006). A multidimensional ideal point IRT model for binary data. doi
  4. (2005). An IRT approach to constructing and scoring pairwise preference items involving stimuli on different dimensions: The Dominance vs. ideal point models 11 Multi-Unidimensional Pairwise-Preference Model. doi
  5. (2007). Constructing personality scales under the assumption of an ideal point response process: toward increasing the flexibility of personality measures. doi
  6. (2009). Estimation of IRT graded models for rating data: Limited vs. full information methods. doi
  7. (1994). Every data set that is well fit by a two-dimensional IRT model can be equally well fit by a lower dimensional model. Paper presented at the 59th Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society.
  8. (2006). Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring? doi
  9. (2005). Further empirical results on parametric vs. non-parametric IRT modeling of Likert-type personality data. doi
  10. (2001). Maximum likelihood estimation of factor and ideal point models for paired comparison data. doi
  11. (2009). Scaling the critics: Uncovering the latent dimensions of movie criticism with an item response approach. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.