Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Birds as tourism flagship species: a case study of tropical islands.

By Diogo Veríssimo, Iain M Fraser, Jim J. Groombridge, Rachel M. Bristol and Douglas C. MacMillan

Abstract

Species selected as flagships to promote conservation activities around the world are typically well known and charismatic mega-fauna. Unfortunately this limits the scope for applying the concept as some critical areas for biodiversity conservation, such as tropical islands, lack such species. In this study, we explore the potential to apply the concept of 'tourism flagship species' to tropical island birds of the Seychelles, an archipelago of considerable importance for conservation that is highly dependent on international tourism. In particular we wish to identify which species attributes are most influential with regard to their potential for fundraising among international tourists. Using a choice experiment approach and using state-of-the-art econometric methods, we found that conservation attributes and physical appearance of the bird species are both important in terms of raising funds for conservation. Nevertheless, conservation attributes ranked higher in the respondents preferences. Our results suggest that there is considerable potential for a variety of species to effectively act as flagships in developing nations that are dependent on international tourism and rich in biodiversity but lack charismatic fauna

Topics: Q
Publisher: The Zoological Society of London
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:kar.kent.ac.uk:27506

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2009). 549–558 c doi
  2. (2009). 549–558 c 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation c
  3. (2005). Applied choice analysis: a primer. Cambridge: doi
  4. (1992). Biodiversity conservation, affluence and poverty: mismatched costs and benefits and efforts to remedy them.
  5. (2001). Birds of the Seychelles.
  6. (2006). Central Bank of Seychelles. doi
  7. (2005). Changing abundance of elephants and willingness to pay for their conservation. doi
  8. (2000). Charismatic megafauna as ‘flagship species’. In Priorities for the conservation of mammalian diversity: has the panda had its day:
  9. (2001). Choice modelling approaches: a superior alternative for environmental valuation? doi
  10. (2006). Contingent valuation: environmental polling or preference engine? doi
  11. (1998). Cost-effectiveness analysis of woodland ecosystem restoration. doi
  12. (2008). Do colored photographs affect willingness to pay responses for endangered species conservation? doi
  13. (1996). Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and meta-analysis. doi
  14. (2002). Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: summary guide. doi
  15. (1997). Economic values of threatened mammals in Britain: a case study of the otter Lutra lutra and the water vole Arvicola terrestris. doi
  16. (2003). Economics and the design of nature conservation policy: a case study of wild goose conservation in Scotland using choice experiments. doi
  17. (1999). Ecotourism: a means to safeguard biodiversity and ecosystem functions? doi
  18. (2007). Endangerment and likeability of wildlife species: how important are they for payments proposed for conservation? doi
  19. (1998). Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: is single-species management passe in the landscape era? doi
  20. (1995). Global biodiversity assessment. Cambridge: doi
  21. (2002). Identifying appropriate flagship species: the importance of culture and local contexts. doi
  22. (2002). Island tourism and sustainable development: Caribbean, Pacific and Mediterranean experiences.
  23. (1997). Islands and tourism: an overview. In Island tourism: trends and prospects:
  24. (2002). Local attitudes towards conservation and tourism around Komodo National Park, doi
  25. (1999). Marginal valuation of charismatic species: implications for conservation.
  26. (2008). Marketing know-how added to conservation tool box in Seychelles. In
  27. (2009). Model selection for the Mixed Logit with Bayesian estimation. doi
  28. (2001). Non-market value of wetlands: a choice modelling study of wetlands in the Upper South East of South Australia and the Murrumbidgee River floodplain in New South Wales. Private and Social Value of Wetlands Research
  29. (1999). On the use of surrogate species in conservation biology. doi
  30. (1996). Parrot conservation and ecotourism in the Windward Islands. doi
  31. (1996). Patterns of behavior in endangered species preservation. doi
  32. (1992). People and parks: linking protected area management with local communities.
  33. (2001). Physical attractiveness of an animal species as a decision factor for its preservation. doi
  34. (1991). Policies for maximizing nature tourism’s ecological and economic benefits.
  35. (2003). Public preferences for wildlife as a focus for biodiversity conservation.
  36. (1998). Recovery and management committees for lion tamarins: partnerships in conservation planning and implementation. doi
  37. (2005). Sea turtles as flagships for protection of the wider Caribbean region.
  38. (1986). Social and perceptual factors in the preservation of animal species.
  39. (2000). Stated choice methods: analysis and application. doi
  40. (2001). Survival Commission. doi
  41. (1998). The case for diminishing marginal existence values. doi
  42. (1994). The effective use of flagship species for conservation of biodiversity: the example of lion tamarins in Brazil. In Creative conservation: interactive management of wild and captive animals: doi
  43. (1998). The effects of information on willingnessto-pay values of endangered species. doi
  44. (1995). The existence of existence value. A study of the economic benefits of an endangered species.
  45. (1998). The relationship between popularity and body size in zoo animals. doi
  46. (2005). The role of ecotourism in conservation: panacea or Pandora’s box? doi
  47. (2005). The role of ecotourism in conservation: panaceaor Pandora’s box?
  48. (2001). The use of willingness-to-pay approaches in mammal conservation. doi
  49. (2003). The willingness to pay for property rights for the giant panda: can a charismatic species be an instrument for nature conservation? Land Econ. doi
  50. (1992). Tourism and development in South Pacific microstates. doi
  51. (2002). Tourism and flagship species in conservation. doi
  52. (1993). United States National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
  53. (2002). Valuing the non-market benefits of wild goose conservation: a comparison of interview and group based approaches. doi
  54. (1996). Wildlife tourism. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.