Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Intake, growth and feed conversion efficiency of finishing beef cattle offered diets based on triticale, maize or grass silages, or ad libitum concentrates

By Padraig O'Kiely

Abstract

peer-reviewedThe intake, growth and feed conversion efficiency of finishing cattle offered whole-crop triticale silage, harvested at different stubble heights, or maize silage, supplemented with different amounts and forms of crude protein, were compared with those of cattle offered grass silage or concentrate ad libitum. Ninety-eight continental crossbred steers (mean (s.d.) initial live weight 509 (38.6) kg) were allocated among 7 treatments in a randomized complete-block design: triticale silage from a crop harvested to a 14 (TS-L) or 35 (TS-H) cm high stubble, maize silage supplemented with a low (MS-LS) or high (MS-HS) protein concentrate, or with approximately half of the supplementary crude protein replaced by urea (MS-SU), grass silage (GS) or concentrate offered ad libitum (ALC). Each silage was offered ad libitum for 134 days, supplemented with 3 kg concentrate per head daily. Carcass gain did not differ (P>0.05) between animals on treatments TS-L and TS-H, but the carcass gain associated with TS-L was lower (P<0.05) than with GS or MS-HS, and with TS-H compared with MS-HS. Carcass gain was lower (P<0.05) for steers on GS compared to MS-HS, there were no differences (P>0.05) among the values for MS-LS, MS-HS and MS-SU; the carcass gain associated with ALC was the highest (P<0.001). The feed efficiency for carcass gain for the animals on TS-L, TS-H, GS, MS-LS, MS-HS, MS-SU and ALC was 44.1, 48.2, 60.8, 59.3, 68.3, 59.8 and 90.1 (s.e. 4.26) kg/t total DM intake, respectively (P<0.001). It is concluded that the ranking on nutritive value was TS<GS<MS<ALC. Elevating the cutting height of triticale conferred little benefit. Half the soybean meal in the barley-based supplement to maize silage could be replaced by barley plus urea without a negative effect on animal performance

Topics: ad libitum concentrate, Cattle, Grass silage, Maize silage, Triticale silage
Publisher: Teagasc (Agriculture and Food Development Authority), Ireland
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:t-stor.teagasc.ie:11019/67
Provided by: T-Stór
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1998). A Net Energy System for Cattle and Sheep”.
  2. (1963). A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. doi
  3. Acid Detergent Fiber in Feeds Filter Bag Technique.
  4. (2003). Agronomic factors affecting the yield and quality of forage maize in Ireland: effect of plastic film system and seeding rate. doi
  5. (1977). An automated procedure for the determination of soluble carbohydrates in herbage. doi
  6. (1983). Anfall, chemische Zusammensetzung und Futterwert von Silosickersaft.
  7. (2006). Changes in yield and chemical composition of wheat, barley and triticale grains harvested during advancing stages of ripening.
  8. (1982). Commission of the European Communities. doi
  9. Commission Regulations 2930/81, 563/82, 1557/82, Commission of the European Communities,
  10. (1997). Comparison of laboratory methods for estimating the digestibility of immature forage maize.
  11. (2005). Composition of maize stover: interaction of harvest date, plastic mulch and cultivar.
  12. (1973). Determination by gas chromatography of short chain fatty acids in ruminal fluids.
  13. (1974). Effect of ammonia concentration on rumen microbial production in vitro. doi
  14. (1966). Effect of method of grass conservation and herbage maturity on performance and body composition of beef cattle.
  15. (2003). Effects of crop maturity and cutting height on the nutritive value of fermented wholecrop wheat and milk production in dairy cows. doi
  16. (2005). Effects of supplementary concentrate level with grass silage, and separate or total mixed ration feeding, on performance and carcass traits of finishing steers. doi
  17. (2005). Ensiled maize and whole-crop wheat forages for beef and dairy cattle: effects on animal performance. In: “Silage Production and Utilisation”
  18. (2008). Evaluation of Lolium perenne L. cv. AberDart and AberDove for silage production.
  19. (2006). Fat and protein metabolism in growing steers fed either grass silage or dried grass. doi
  20. (2008). Harvest index of barley, wheat and triticale during advancing stages of ripening.
  21. (1994). Intake and digestibility of urea-treated whole-crop wheat and liveweight gain by dairy heifers. doi
  22. (2009). Intake, digestibility and rumen characteristics in cattle offered whole-crop wheat or barley silages of contrasting grain to straw ratios. doi
  23. (2008). Intake, digestibility, rumen fermentation and performance of beef cattle offered diets based on whole-crop wheat or barley harvested at two cutting heights relative to maize silage or ad libitum concentrates. doi
  24. (2008). Intake, performance and carcass characteristics of beef cattle offered diets based on whole-crop wheat or forage maize relative to grass silage or ad libitum concentrates. doi
  25. (1976). Levels, sources and methods of nitrogen supplementation of maize silage for beef production. doi
  26. (2008). Major and Micro Nutrient Advice for Productive Agricultural Crops”. 3rd edition. Teagasc,
  27. (1997). Measurement of total starch in cereal products by amyloglucosidase-α-amylase method: Collaborative study.
  28. Methane emissions, feed intake, and performance of finishing beef cattle offered maize silages harvested at four different stages of maturity. doi
  29. Methane emissions, feed intake, performance, digestibility, and rumen fermentation of finishing beef cattle offered whole-crop wheat silages differing in grain content. doi
  30. Neutral Detergent Fiber in Feeds Filter Bag Technique.
  31. (1990). Official Methods of Analysis: 1st Supplement”. 15th edition.
  32. (2007). Performance of finishing beef steers offered total mixed rations constituted at feeding or ensiling.
  33. (1980). Planned beef production”.
  34. (1989). Polythene Film Suitable for Covering Silage”. doi
  35. (2004). Potential for triticale in low cost production systems. In:
  36. (1996). Potential of beef production systems based on grass.
  37. (1989). Protein: the PDI system. In: “Ruminant Nutrition – Recommended Allowances and Feed Tables”
  38. (2009). Rumen fermentation, microbial protein synthesis, and nutrient flow to the omasum in cattle offered corn silage, grass silage, or whole-crop wheat. doi
  39. (2009). Silage quality and meat production.
  40. (2010). Statistics Office). doi
  41. (2007). Stover development in forage maize: interaction of harvest date, plastic mulch and cultivar.
  42. (1991). The Biochemistry of Silage”. Chalcombe Publications, doi
  43. (1966). The buffering constituents of herbage and of silage. doi
  44. (2004). The effects of processing at harvest and cutting height of urea-treated wholecrop wheat on performance and digestibility in dairy cows.
  45. (2001). The volatility of components of grass silage on oven drying and the inter-relationship between dry-matter content estimated by different analytical methods. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.