Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Can bilateral trade agreements help induce free trade?

By Raymond Glenn Riezman

Abstract

There has been growing debate about whether bilateral trade agreements are damaging multilateral efforts to eliminate barriers to international trade. This paper develops a model in which trading blocs always charge optimal tariffs and make trade agreements based on strategic considerations. We ask a very simple question. Does the fact that trading blocs can form bilateral trade agreements make Free trade less likely to occur? The answer is that it depends on the size distribution of the trading blocs. If there is one large trading bloc along with some smaller ones then bilateral trade agreements allow the smaller trading blocs to coalesce and block the monopoly power of large trading blocs. In this case, bilateral trade agreements facilitate the attainment of free trade. Not allowing customs unions leads to more not less protection. If trading blocs are of roughly equivalent size then bilateral trade agreements allow groups of trading blocs to more effectively monopolize world trade in which case they may make free trade less likely. These results suggest that a policy that inhibits the formation of trading blocs may be harmful. We also compute the welfare effects of trade agreements to get some idea of how empirically important these issues are

Topics: HF, JZ
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 1999
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:2081

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1995). 1993a, Multilateral tariff cooperation during the formation of regional free trade areas, NBER Working paper No: doi
  2. (1996). Are trade blocs conducive to free trade?, doi
  3. (1994). Bringing GATT into the core, doi
  4. (1991). Commodity Trade and International Risk Sharing: How much do Financial Markets Matter?, doi
  5. (1996). Compatibility of regional and multilateral trading arrangements: reforming the WTO process,
  6. (1985). Customs unions and the core, doi
  7. (1969). Customs unions and the theory of tariffs,
  8. (1995). Customs unions, regional trading blocs and welfare, doi
  9. (1991). Delegation games in customs unions, doi
  10. (1993). Endogenous protection and trade diversion, doi
  11. (1995). Free trade agreements versus customs unions, NBER WP#5084 doi
  12. (1987). Models of Business Cycles, doi
  13. (1994). Multilateral trade negotiations and preferential trading arrangements, doi
  14. (1990). Optimal tariff equilibria with customs unions, doi
  15. (1996). Preferential trading areas and multilateralism: strangers, friends or foes?, in Free Trade Areas or Free Trade? The Economics of Preferential Trading Agreements doi
  16. (1996). Regional trading agreements: natural or supernatural?, doi
  17. (1995). Regionalism and the world trading system, doi
  18. (1991). Regionalism and the world trading system, in Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Policy implications of trade and currency zones.,
  19. (1993). Some welfare effects of dynamic customs union formation, mimeo, doi
  20. (1950). The customs union issue, doi
  21. (1994). The new regionalism: trade liberalization or insurance?, doi
  22. (1991). The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An Expanded doi
  23. (1996). The size of trading blocs: Market power and world welfare effects, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.