Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Globalisation and security in the Asia-Pacific: an initial investigation

By Christopher W. Hughes

Abstract

Globalisation and security vie individually for the status of the most important, yet least well conceptualised, of issues for academics and policy-makers. Moreover, despite the growing sense of its significance, the interconnection of globalisation and security, or globalisation-security nexus, is also understudied and poorly conceptualised. Finally, the differential impact of the globalisation-security nexus upon the various regions of the world is also understudied. This working paper is an initial attempt to fill these gaps in our knowledge by investigating the globalisation-security nexus in both generic conceptual terms and in relation to the specific impact of globalisation in the Asia-Pacific region. The first part of the paper demonstrates how globalisation as a qualitatively new phenomenon is capable of transcending territorial and sovereign space, exploits potential divisibility between the security interests of sovereign states and their citizens, and has thus challenged us to extend our conceptions of security and to interlink domestic and international security issues. The second section of the paper then argues that globalisation requires a vertical extension of security in terms of the looking below the level of the state and at alternative security actors, including societal groups, individuals and TNCs, which are also capable of consuming, denying and supplying security to others. The horizontal expansion of security is needed in terms of broadening the security agenda away from the traditional military dimension and towards economic, environmental and societal security issues which have come to the fore under conditions of globalisation. The third section of the paper then moves on to demonstrate how globalisation has had a differential impact across regions in accordance with the ability of sovereign states, the existing unit for ordering social space, to resist the impact of trans-sovereign problems. In the case of the Asia-Pacific, this paper argues that the twin processes of decolonisation and bipolarisation have placed relative limits upon this ability for states, left them systemically vulnerable to globalisation as a process which emphasises the divisibility of state and societal security interests, and hence enabled globalisation to exacerbate existing military, economic and environmental security problems in the region

Topics: JZ
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 2000
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:2064

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. Aart
  2. (2000). Asia's Emerging Regional Order: Reconciling Traditional and Human Security, doi
  3. (1998). Beyond the great divide: globalization and the theory of international relations', doi
  4. (1995). Commission on Global Governance doi
  5. (1999). Economics, politics, and (international) political economy: the need for a balanced diet in an era of globalisation', doi
  6. (2000). Globalization and the study of international security', doi
  7. (1991). People, States and Fear: An Agenda for Security Studies in the PostCold War Era, London, Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  8. (1998). Private Armies and Military Intervention, doi
  9. (1995). Securitization and desecuritization',
  10. (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis, doi
  11. (2000). The global drug trade versus the nation state',
  12. (1996). The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy, Cambridge, doi
  13. (1995). The Third World Security Predicament: State Making, Regional Conflict, and the International System, doi
  14. (1999). Transnational crime, drugs and security in East Asia', doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.