Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Reviewing Member States’ Commitment to the European External Action Service. EPIN Working Paper No. 34, 20 November 2012

By Vivien Pertusot, Almut Möller, Julian Rappold, Edward Burke, Louise van Schaik, Paul Ivan, Fredrik Landal, Maria João Seabra, Elina Viilup, Ignacio Molina, Alicia Sorroza and Steven Blockmans


Based on interviews with diplomats from a representative cross-section of nine member states and members of the EEAS itself, the research findings of this EPIN Working Paper confirm long-standing traditions and member state perceptions of cooperation with European institutions. The paper also reveals new aspects of the intergovernmental method of foreign policy shaping and making in the European Union; in particular how different national positions can positively or negatively affect the consolidation of the EEAS and the role of the EU as an international actor. As such, the Working Paper makes an original contribution to the existing literature on one of most discussed actors in the European Union’s post-Lisbon architecture in the domain of EU external action

Topics: common foreign & security policy 1993--European Global Strategy
Year: 2012
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2011). 8 Non-paper on the European External Action Service from the Foreign Ministers of Belgium,
  2. (2011). A Diplomatic Entrepreneur Making the Most of the European External Action Service”, A Chatham House Report.
  3. (2005). an EPIN 'Steering Committee' takes the most important decisions. Currently there are seven member institutes:
  4. (2005). an EPIN Steering Committee takes the most important decisions. Currently there are seven member institutes:
  5. Beantwoording vragen van het lid Albayrak over de situatie van de
  6. Eesti Euroopa Liidu poliitika”, Diplomaatia ([tt_news]=1346&cHash=c6fd06a4bc).
  7. (2010). En jämförelse av Sveriges utrikesdeklarationer 2000-2010: Vad är svensk utrikespolitik?, Stockholm: Utrikespolitiska institutet,
  8. (2010). establishing the Organisation and Functioning of the EEAS,
  9. (2011). Estonia is one of the 12 EU member states with Belgium,
  10. (2011). European External Action Service, Report by the High Representative to the European Parliament, doi
  11. (2012). European Foreign Policy Scorecard 2012, London: The European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR),
  12. European Policy Centre (multiple authors) (2007), “The EU Foreign Service: how to build a more effective common policy”,
  13. (2011). Fund of the United States (GMF) and the Compagnia di San Paolo, Transatlantic Trends doi
  14. (1147). Ministers identify glitches in EU diplomatic service”, 6
  15. Modernisering Nederlandse diplomatie, Lijst van vragen en antwoorden,
  16. (2011). More Action, Better Service. How to Strengthen the European External Action Service”, Carnegie Policy Outlook,
  17. (2008). Motie van het Lid Ormel c.s.”,
  18. (2011). Nederland beter af met EU-diplomatie”,
  19. Netherlands government (2010), “Kamerbrief inzake Europese Dienst voor het Externe Optreden”,
  20. Netherlands government (2011a), “Mondernisering Nederlandse diplomatie”,
  21. Netherlands government (2011b), “Beoordeling Nieuwe Commissievoorstellen Fiche over: Mededeling Consulaire bescherming EU burgers in derde landen”,
  22. (2011). Netherlands government (2011c), “Verslag van de
  23. Netherlands government (2011d), Staat van de Europese Unie 2011-2012,
  24. planning is being carried out as if the EEAS did not exist. Beyond recommendations for the 2013 review, a concrete output of MFA action in this area has been that of providing personnel for the EEAS.
  25. (2012). Radio programme,
  26. Schaik (eds) (2010), “The European External Action Service: Preparing for Success”,
  27. Search engine of newspaper searching for Ashton (
  28. (2011). Spring
  29. (2011). The Europeanization of Foreign Policy”, doi
  30. (2011). The latest manifestation of this partnership was the signing on 13
  31. The other school of thought, led by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and supported by the EVI study, agrees that looking to Asia is important but not as important as being represented in Estonia’s most important allies and important neighbours (the US,
  32. (2011). The Romanian MFA also focused on supporting the actual setting up of the EEAS, with the ministry being engaged in the process both before and after 1
  33. (2011). Upgrading the EU’s role as Global Actor: Institutions, Law and the Restructuring of European Diplomacy”, Centre for European Policy Studies,
  34. (2012). Verslag van de Informele Raad Buitenlandse Zaken (‘Gymnich’) van 9 en 10 maart
  35. with President Mariano Rajoy coming to power, it seems that there is renewed interest in exploiting the EEAS actively and in its deployment being “effective and potent”.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.