Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Modeling Kepler Transit Light Curves as False Positives: Rejection of Blend Scenarios for Kepler-9, and Validation of Kepler-9 d, a Super-Earth-Size Planet in a Multiple System

By Edward W. Dunham, Steve B. Howell, Matthew J. Holman, Guillermo Torres, Andrej Prsa, Eric B. Ford, III Thomas N. Gauthier, David G. Monet, Samuel N. Quinn, Jon M. Jenkins, Timothy M. Brown, David R. Ciardi, David W. Latham, Natalie M. Batalha, Stephen T. Bryson, Ronald L. Gilliland, Jack J. Lissauer, David G. Koch, Geoffrey W. Marcy, Howard Isaacson, Lars A. Buchhave, Daniel C. Fabrycky, David Charbonneau, William J. Borucki and Francois Fressin

Abstract

Light curves from the Kepler Mission contain valuable information on the nature of the phenomena producing the transit-like signals. To assist in exploring the possibility that they are due to an astrophysical false positive we describe a procedure (BLENDER) to model the photometry in terms of a blend rather than a planet orbiting a star. A blend may consist of a background or foreground eclipsing binary (or star-planet pair) whose eclipses are attenuated by the light of the candidate and possibly other stars within the photometric aperture. We apply BLENDER to the case of Kepler-9 (KIC 3323887), a target harboring two previously confirmed Saturn-size planets (Kepler-9 b and Kepler-9 c) showing transit timing variations, and an additional shallower signal with a 1.59 day period suggesting the presence of a super-Earth-size planet. Using BLENDER together with constraints from other follow-up observations we are able to rule out all blends for the two deeper signals and provide independent validation of their planetary nature. For the shallower signal, we rule out a large fraction of the false positives that might mimic the transits. The false alarm rate for remaining blends depends in part (and inversely) on the unknown frequency of small-size planets. Based on several realistic estimates of this frequency, we conclude with very high confidence that this small signal is due to a super-Earth-size planet (Kepler-9 d) in a multiple system, rather than a false positive. The radius is determined to be 1.64(exp)(sub-14),R, and current spectroscopic observations are as yet insufficient to establish its mass

Topics: Astrophysics
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:casi.ntrs.nasa.gov:20120009949
Sorry, our data provider has not provided any external links therefore we are unable to provide a link to the full text.

Suggested articles


To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.