Article thumbnail

By 

Abstract

The following objectives of the study were formulated: i) to investi-gate differences in measured signal to noise ratios while recording speech-evoked auditory brainstem response (cABR) and cortical late latency response (LLR) in low and high acceptable noise level (ANL) groups; and ii) to compare peak to peak amplitude of cABR (V-A) and LLR (N1-P2) in low and high ANL groups. A total of 23 normal hearing participants was included in the study. One shot replicative and partly exploratory research design was utilized to study the effect of signal to noise ratio in a recorded waveform on afferent mechanism, assessed by cABR and LLR on participants having values of ANL of ≤7 (low ANL group) and ≥13 (high ANL group). There were no differences in signal to noise ratio in the recorded waveforms of cABR and LLR between low and high ANL groups at both brainstem and cortical levels. However, the peak to peak amplitude of V-A of cABR and N1-P2 of LLR were both statistically larger in the high ANL group compared to their counter-part. The signal to noise ratio in recorded waveforms did not differen-tiated cABR (V-A) or LLR (N1-P2) in low and high ANL groups. However, Larger peak to peak amplitudes in the high ANL group sug-gests differences higher processing centers in the upper brainstem to the auditory cortex. The findings of the study may be useful in deter-mining the patient acceptability of noise

Year: 2016
OAI identifier: oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.789.303
Provided by: CiteSeerX
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub... (external link)
  • ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub... (external link)
  • http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/v... (external link)

  • To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

    Suggested articles