Location of Repository

Do differences in the administrative structure of populations confound comparisons of geographic health inequalities?

By A.L. Jackson, C.A. Davies and A.H. Leyland


<p>Background: Geographical health inequalities are naturally described by the variation in health outcomes between areas (e.g. mortality rates). However, comparisons made between countries are hampered by our lack of understanding of the effect of the size of administrative units, and in particular the modifiable areal unit problem. Our objective was to assess how differences in geographic and administrative units used for disseminating data affect the description of health inequalities.</p>\ud \ud <p>Methods: Retrospective study of standard populations and deaths aggregated by administrative regions within 20 European countries, 1990-1991. Estimated populations and deaths in males aged 0-64 were in 5 year age bands. Poisson multilevel modelling was conducted of deaths as standardised mortality ratios. The variation between regions within countries was tested for relationships with the mean region population size and the unequal distribution of populations within each country measured using Gini coefficients.</p>\ud \ud <p>Results: There is evidence that countries whose regions vary more in population size show greater variation and hence greater apparent inequalities in mortality counts. The Gini coefficient, measuring inequalities in population size, ranged from 0.1 to 0.5 between countries; an increase of 0.1 was accompanied by a 12-14% increase in the standard deviation of the mortality rates between regions within a country.</p>\ud \ud <p>Conclusions: Apparently differing health inequalities between two countries may be due to differences in geographical structure per se, rather than having any underlying epidemiological cause. Inequalities may be inherently greater in countries whose regions are more unequally populated.</p

Publisher: BioMed Central
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.gla.ac.uk:47730
Provided by: Enlighten

Suggested articles



  1. (1991). Women and Social-Class - a Methodological Study Comparing Individual, Household, and Census Measures as Predictors of BlackWhite Differences in Reproductive History. doi
  2. (1993). Class and Health - Should We Be Focusing on Places or People. doi
  3. (2002). Output areas for 2001. The Census Data System Chichester:
  4. (2008). AE: Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries. doi
  5. (2009). SV: Individual and collective bodies: using measures of variance and association in contextual epidemiology. doi
  6. (1999). Multilevel modelling of the geographical distributions of diseases. doi
  7. Multilevel Analysis London:
  8. (2004). Increasing inequalities in premature mortality in Great Britain. doi
  9. (2001). Shifting Boundaries, Shifting Results: The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem. doi
  10. (1984). The modifiable areal unit problem. Geo Books doi
  11. (2007). FA: Cause-specific inequalities in mortality in Scotland: two decades of change. A population-based study. doi
  12. (1999). Office for National Statistics: Gazetteer of the old and new geographies of the United Kingdom London: Office for National Statistics
  13. (2001). The production of an updated set of data zones to incorporate
  14. (2007). Deprivation indices, population health and geography: An evaluation of the spatial effectiveness of indices at multiple scales. doi
  15. (2002). Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: Does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter? The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. doi
  16. (2003). Achieving data compatability over space and time: create consistent geographical zones. doi
  17. (1990). Dorling D: Are socioeconomic inequalities in mortality decreasing or increasing within some British regions? An observational study, doi
  18. (2008). Small area inequalities in health: Are we underestimating them? Soc Sci Med doi
  19. (2000). DH: The impact of area deprivation on differences in health: does the choice of the geographical classification matter?
  20. (2007). Representation and local democracy: Geographical variations in elector to councillor ratios. Political Geography doi
  21. (1997). Organisation: Atlas of Mortality
  22. (2003). Lung cancer mortality in European regions (1955-1997). Ann Oncol
  23. (1995). An Introduction to Medical Statistics Oxford: doi
  24. (2001). Health Organization: Measuring Health Inequalities: Gini Coefficient and Concentration Index. Epidemiological Bulletin
  25. (1991). On the Measurement of Inequalities in Health. doi
  26. (1994). Using Gini-Style Indexes to Evaluate the Spatial Patterns of Health Practitioners - Theoretical Considerations and an Application Based on Alberta Data. doi
  27. (2002). A: Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. doi
  28. (2003). Choosing area based socioeconomic measures to monitor social inequalities in low birth weight and childhood lead poisoning: The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project (US). doi
  29. (2005). MP: Choice of geographic unit influences socioeconomic inequalities in breast cancer survival.
  30. (2010). al: Educational inequalities in avoidable mortality in Europe. doi
  31. (1950). Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals. American Sociological Review doi
  32. (1990). Differential mortality - Some comparisons between England and Wales, Finland and France, based on inequality measures. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.