Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Self-Identity, Empathy and Sympathy in Reading Transcripts

By Barry S. Godfrey


When conducting oral history interviews empathetic relationships tend to be\ud created between the researcher and the subject, and this is seen as an essential\ud aid for historical and/or sociological analysis. This article examines the basis of\ud these empathetic relationships - the emotional reaction of the interviewer to\ud what is being narrated by the interviewee. It goes on to question whether it is\ud possible to maintain an emotional/empathetic relationship with ‘unlikeable’\ud subjects; whether the emotions created during an interview are retained when\ud the interviews are transcribed, archived, and accessed by researchers who did\ud not carry out the original interviews (sometimes many years after the\ud interviews took place). Lastly, it examines the implications that this may have\ud for interpretive analysis

Topics: H1, BF
Publisher: University of Huddersfield
Year: 2004
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2002). A second take: revisiting interviews with a different purpose’, paper presented at the
  2. (1998). Distressing histories and unhappy interviewing’, Oral History,
  3. (2000). Doing Qualitative Research Differently, doi
  4. (1998). Evidence, empathy and ethics. Lessons from oral histories of the Klan’, doi
  5. (2000). Identity: Theoretical and Methodological Issues _____________________________________________________________________
  6. (1990). In-Depth Interviewing, Sydney, doi
  7. (1999). Interviewing for Social Scientists. An introductory resource with examples,
  8. (1994). Life After Life, doi
  9. (2002). Narrative Research is Always Delicate”, paper to Oxford Sociology dept. workshop,
  10. (2002). No Sense of an Ending. The effects of long-term imprisonment amongst Republican prisoners and their families,
  11. (1988). Not so much a programme, more a way of life: Oral history and Spanish fascism’,
  12. (1999). Only Listen … Some reflections on Tony Parker’s methodology’ in Keith Soothill (ed) Criminal Conversations. An Anthology of the Work of Tony Parker,
  13. (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists, doi
  14. (1995). Qualitative Interviewing. The art of hearing data, doi
  15. (2001). Reminiscence and oral history: parallel universe or shared endeavour?’ doi
  16. (1991). That’s Not What I Said”: Interpretative conflict in oral narrative research’
  17. (2002). Towards ethical practice in the use of archived transcripted interviews’, doi
  18. (1991). US Academics and Third World Women: Is ethical research possible?’

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.