In this paper I examine some of the implications, possibilities, and dangers of\ud addressing the experience of ‘madness’ or ‘mental illness’1 within\ud autobiographical narrative: in particular, I ask how madness can be narrated, or\ud spoken. I suggest that an attentive reading of narrative form, as the outworking\ud and evidence of a way of knowing and thinking about the world, may reveal\ud authorial attempts to manage and stretch the constraints inherent in\ud conventional narrative’s tendency toward linearity and resolution, a tendency\ud which is, arguably, inimical to the expression of madness. Insinuated in this\ud process of working with form is a particular narrative mode of existence which\ud has implications for the psychodynamics of living with mental distress. With\ud reference to the work of Sarah Kofman, I propose the idea that a ‘writing\ud without power’ may be a salutary way to address chronic distress, and to\ud reformulate identity in the light of biographical disruption
To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.