Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Learning styles and learning strategies: assessing their impact on Science Foundation students

By Robert Ellis and Robert Allan


Science Foundation is an integral part of the University of Huddersfield’s commitment to widening participation. It is specifically designed for those looking to study and work in the sciences but who lack the appropriate qualifications or experience to enrol as first-year undergraduates. In each year’s cohort there is a wide spectrum of diversity in terms of age, ethnicity, social class, previous academic achievement and previous work experience. Many of those who enrol can be described as non-traditional. In the main, they are returning to full-time education following an extended break or they have recently underperformed in previous studies. Intuitively, the introduction of learning styles into the curriculum may help these students cope better with their transition into the culture of higher education. Building on the recent critiques of learning style theories, this article gives consideration to the implications for teaching and learning that their introduction have. It places quantitative and qualitative research undertaken with Science Foundation students within a framework of equity and employability. Ultimately it argues that the way in which learning styles are used has to reflect the motivations and aspirations of students

Topics: Q1, LB2300
Publisher: Institute for Access Studies and The European Access Network, Staffordshire University
Year: 2008
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1984). Approaches to Learning’ doi
  2. (2003). Census
  3. (2001). Census of England and Wales’, at http:// n e i g h b o u r h o o d . s t a t i s t i c s . g o v . u k / doi
  4. (2002). Developing Teaching and Learning doi
  5. (2006). Embedding Employability into the Curriculum, York: The Higher Education Academy. Also at http:// w w w . h e a c a d e m y . a c . u k / r e s o u r c e s / p u b l i c a t i o n s / l e a r n i n g a n d e m p l o y a b i l i t y (accessed 8
  6. (2006). Enhancing graduate employability: best intentions and mixed outcomes’, doi
  7. (2008). Entwistle (eds) The Experience of Learning: Implications for teaching and studying
  8. (2007). Experiences of poverty and educational disadvantage,
  9. (2006). From college to university: looking backwards, looking forward’, doi
  10. (2006). From life crisis to lifelong learning. Rethinking working class ‘drop out’ from higher education, doi
  11. (2006). Gender, Foundation Degrees and the knowledge-driven eonomy’, doi
  12. (2007). Graduates lacking of soft skills employers warn’, Guardian Unlimited, at http:/ / w w w . g u a r d i a n . c o .
  13. (2000). Higher Education and Employment: opportunities and limitations in the formation of skills in a mass higher education system’, doi
  14. (2006). I don’t feel like “a student”, I feel like “me”!”: the oversimplifiation of mature learners’ experience(s)’, doi
  15. (1998). Learning and Studying, A Research Perspective, doi
  16. (2005). Learning Journeys: the experiences of students working towards a Foundation Degree’, doi
  17. (2005). Learning Orientations and Study Contracts’
  18. (2008). Learning styles and learning strategies: assessing their impact on Science Foundation students Original Citation Ellis, Robert and Allan,
  19. (1997). Learning Styles: A critique’, doi
  20. (2003). Learning styles: adoption and adaptation’ in L. Le Versha and G. Nicholls (eds) Teaching at Post-16, effective teaching in the Alevel, AS and VCE curriculum, London: Kogan P a g e . doi
  21. (2005). Listening to the Needs of the Mature Student - a qualitative survey’, Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning
  22. (2006). Prosperity for all in the Global
  23. (2007). Science Foundation: Welcome to Science Foundation at Huddersfield’, at
  24. (2004). Should we be using learning styles?, London: Learning and Skills Research Centre.
  25. (2006). Super Output Area ID2004 Profiles’, at: community/stat is t ics/depr ivat ion/supoutputarea.shtml (accessed 24
  26. (2003). Teaching for Quality Learning at University, 2nd edition, doi
  27. (2003). The contribution of learning, teaching, assessment and other curriculum projects to student employability’, ESECT, Briefings on Employability 3, at http:// w w w . h e a c a d e m y . a c . u k / r e s o u r c e s / d e t a i l /
  28. (2006). The influence of first-year chemistry students’ learning experiences on their educational choices’, doi
  29. (1992). The manual of learning styles, 3rd edition, Maidenhead: Peter H o n e y . doi
  30. (2000). Vocationalism and Relevance in Higher Education: issues doi
  31. (2005). Vocationalism and the decline of vocational learning: a warning from England’, paper presented at

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.