Article thumbnail

Can rewards for environmental services benefit the poor? Lessons from Asia

By Beria Leimona, World Agroforestry Centre (icraf, Laxman Joshi and Meine Van Noordwijk

Abstract

Abstract: Rewards for environmental services (RES) link global priorities on poverty reduction and environmental sustainability and are designed to balance effectiveness and efficiency with fairness and pro-poor characteristics. Yet, emerging RES approaches tend to focus primarily on the efficiency in provisioning the environmental services and often neglect the perspectives of various actors involved in natural resource management, their livelihood strategies and the multi-dimensional nature of poverty. This paper assesses some key issues associated with the design and implementation of RES in various Asian pilot sites by developing and exploring two propositions related to conditions required for RES to effectively contribute to poverty alleviation, and to preferred forms of pro-poor mechanisms. Our first proposition is that only under specific circumstances will actual cash incentives to individual RES participants contribute substantially to poverty alleviation in ES provider communities. The second proposition is that non-financial incentives to ES providers will contribute to reducing poverty by linking the communit

Topics: Asia, conservation, financial payment, non-financial payment, payments for environmental services, pro-p
Year: 2009
DOI identifier: 10.18352/ijc.121
OAI identifier: oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.617.6863
Provided by: CiteSeerX
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.worldagroforestry.o... (external link)
  • http://www.worldagroforestry.o... (external link)
  • http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/v... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.