Location of Repository

A Framework to Review Performance Prism

By 

Abstract

This is the author's peer-reviewed final manuscript, as accepted by the publisher. The published article is copyrighted by Emerald Group Publishing and can be found at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/products/journals/journals.htm?id=ijopm.Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to develop an exclusive review framework for Performance Prism.\ud Design/methodology/approach - An extensive literature survey on performance measurement is used to identify the main aspects of the review in such systems. Various dimensions related to the characteristics of Performance Prism are explored. All the findings are then rationally put together to develop the proposed conceptual framework.\ud Findings - The paper presents a conceptual model to review performance measurement systems (PMS) which are designed based on Performance Prism. The presented framework categorizes review processes and tools into two main categories; Business Performance Review (BPRw) and Performance Measurement System Review (PMSR). In BPRw, a loop is presented in three levels -with regards to the five facets of Performance Prism- which indicates the performance management process. PMSR deals with reviewing the efficiency and effectiveness of the design and implementation of the PMS itself. Several methods and tools have been gathered from the literature (e.g. relevance test, measures profile, etc) in this section to examine the relevance of measures, and some have been introduced (including a method to determine inconsistencies in\ud organization's performance trends between stakeholder, strategic and operational level) to study and challenge the validity of strategic assumptions and strategies, and appropriateness of infrastructure. Implications of various factors such as organizational culture, change management, and characteristics of the measures (level of the measure, managers who receive reports including the measure, and supporting infrastructure) are highlighted.\ud Research limitations/implications – In contrast to PMS design and implementation, research on PMS review is limited. This is more evident in the literature concerning Performance Prism. The empirical evidence of usefulness is beyond the scope of this article.\ud Practical implications - The framework provides a procedural action for reviewing both business performance and PMS performance when applying the Performance Prism in practice. It provides a foundation for further empirical research.\ud Originality/value - This study adds to the body of literature, by proposing a comprehensive review framework to be used in Performance Prism

Topics: Business Performance Review, Performance Prism, Performance Measurement System Design Review, Performance Measurement System Implementation Review
Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing
Year: 2012
DOI identifier: 10.1108/01443571211274486
OAI identifier: oai:ir.library.oregonstate.edu:1957/37138
Provided by: ScholarsArchive@OSU

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2000). A framework for uditing & enhancing performance measurement systems.
  2. (2005). A framework to review performance measurement systems.
  3. (1996). A performance measurement approach to the reengineering of manufacturing enterprises.
  4. (2005). A review of performance measurement towards performance management.
  5. (1988). An analysis of performance measurement systems in selected just in time operations.
  6. (2003). An integral framework for performance measurement.
  7. (1989). Are your performance measures obsolete?
  8. (1999). Assessing for Excellence-A Practical Guide for Self Assessment,
  9. (2001). Balanced scorecard implementation in SMEsreflection in literature and practice. SMESME Conference.
  10. (2002). Balanced scorecard step by step: maximizing performance and maintaining results ,
  11. (1999). Balanced scorecard-a rising trend in strategic performance measurement.
  12. (2003). Beyond BSC : Refining the search for organizaional success measures. Long Range Planning,
  13. (2003). Business performance measurement-past, present & future.
  14. (2002). Data Visualization.
  15. (1991). Design of performance measures for time based companies.
  16. (1997). Designing performance measures-A structured approach.
  17. (2000). Designing, implementing & updating performance measurement system.
  18. (2006). Dynamics of performance measurement and organisational culture.
  19. (1996). Getting Measure of Your Business,
  20. (2007). How culture evolves-an institutional analysis.
  21. (1997). Integrated performance measurement system-a development guide.
  22. (1985). Issues in developing a performance criteria system for an organization.
  23. (1996). Keeping Score-Using the Right Metrics to Drive World Class Performance,
  24. (1991). Link firm strategy to operating decisions through performance measurement.
  25. (1991). Linking the shop floor to the top floor : Here's a framework for measuring manufacturing performance. management Accounting
  26. (1991). Measure Up-The Essential Guide to Measuring Business Performance,
  27. (1991). Measure Up! How to Measure Corporate Performance,
  28. (1995). Measure Up! Yardsticks for Continuous Improvement,
  29. (1998). Measuring Business Performance-Why, What and How,
  30. (2003). Measuring performance in a changing business envirounment.
  31. (2007). Measuring to learn whilst learning to measure.
  32. (1991). Measuring, Managing & Maximizing Performance,
  33. (2004). Performance measurement and adaptation of balanced scorecard-a survey of municipal goverments in the USA and Canada.
  34. (2002). Performance measurement frameworks-a review. Business Performance Measurement-Theory & Practice. Cambridge,
  35. (1991). Performance Measurement in Service Businesses,
  36. (2000). Performance measurement system design, developing & testing a process based approach.
  37. (2001). Performance measurement systems must be engineered.
  38. (2004). Performance measurement-from philosophy to practice.
  39. (2006). Performance measurements in the implementaion of information system in small and medium sized enterprises-a framework and empirical analysis.
  40. (1989). Planning and Measurement
  41. (1993). Putting the balanced scorcard to work.
  42. (2008). Researching performance measurement systems-An information systems perspective.
  43. (1988). SERVQUAL : A multiple item scale for measuring customer perceptions of service quality.
  44. (2004). Strategy Maps-Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes,
  45. (2000). Ten mega-trends that will revolutionize supply chain logistics.
  46. (1992). The balanced scorcard-measures that drive performance.
  47. (1996). The changing basis of performance measurement.
  48. (1991). The demystification of the acronym in management accounting.
  49. (2005). The French Tableau de bord and the american Balanced Scorecard-a critical analysis.
  50. (1990). The New Performance Measurement ChallengeMeasuring Operation for World Class Competition,
  51. (1994). The Performance Paradox.
  52. (2001). The Performance Prism in Practice,
  53. (2000). The performance prism to boost M&A success.
  54. (2002). The Performance Prism: The Scorecard for Measuring and Managing Business Success, London, Financial Times/Prentice
  55. (2001). Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis,
  56. (1992). Use of non-financial performance measures.
  57. (1996). Using the balanced scorcard as a strategic management system.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.