Article thumbnail

Recycling knowledge, attitudes and behavior for on-campus and off-campus students in organized living groups at Oregon State University



Graduation date: 1997The purpose of this study was to examine Oregon State University students' self-reported\ud knowledge, attitudes, and behavior about recycling. Students living in on-campus\ud and off-campus organized living groups were mailed a four-page survey with\ud questions about their recycling activities, their attitudes about recycling, their opinions of\ud the effectiveness of the campus recycling program, and their demographic information.\ud The study population included all students living in OSU's residence halls, cooperatives,\ud and fraternity and sorority houses. Three hundred fifteen surveys were mailed, and 237\ud were returned, for an overall response rate of 75%.\ud The results showed that:\ud 1) Based on the criteria used to distinguish between recyclers and non-recyclers, 95% of\ud the sample were recyclers, with women reporting recycling behavior at a higher level\ud than men.\ud 2) There were no significant differences in attitudes about recycling between recyclers\ud and non-recyclers. Recyclers, however, are more likely than non-recyclers to make\ud purchases based on their concern for the environment.\ud 3) Most OSU students who recycle spend less than 30 minutes per month recycling, and\ud it appears to be a well-established pattern in their lives. More than 50% of the\ud students recycle on a daily or a weekly basis. 4) OSU students recycle all materials except plastics at high rates, ranging from 76% for glass to 87% for paper. Plastics were recycled by 64% of the students who recycle. 5) Students recycle at residences and in classrooms and offices on the OSU campus, and\ud report the least recycling activity at the Memorial Union. OSU students mainly use\ud the curbside collection service for off-campus recycling. 6) OSU students receive information about recycling from a wide variety of sources, including school, home, and the media.\ud One recommendation based on this study is that Campus Recycling provide education about materials re-processing and about the importance of purchasing products with recycled content to close the three-sided recycling loop, as well as to introduce the concept of source reduction. Another recommendation is that organized housing groups name a recycling coordinator who will educate and motivate the residents of the housing group to recycle. Eighty-one percent of the respondents reported television as a source of information about recycling. Additional research is needed to identify the time slots and programs watched by students if this media will be used for future educational interventions about recycling. Finally, because this survey dealt only with recycling of non-hazardous materials, additional research is needed to gather information on disposal of hazardous materials like batteries, automobile fluids, and household paint and cleaners

Year: 1997
OAI identifier:
Provided by: ScholarsArchive@OSU

Suggested articles


  1. (1996). 24). The Sunday Oregonian,
  2. (1995). Actively caring for the environment: An integration of behaviorism and humanism. doi
  3. (1994). Attitudes and recycling: Does the measurement of affect enhance behavioral prediction? doi
  4. (1992). Blueprint for green marketing.
  5. (1996). Campus Recycling & Waste Management. Web page: General information.
  6. (1991). College students and recycling: Their attitudes and behaviors.
  7. (1996). Commingled versus separated curbside recycling: Does sorting matter? doi
  8. (1994). Comparison of selfreported recycling attitudes and behaviors with actual behavior. doi
  9. (1994). Consumer recycling goals and their effect on decisions to recycle: A means-end chain analysis. doi
  10. (1995). Corvallis Disposal and Recycling Company.
  11. (1995). Creating a sustainable materials economy. In
  12. (1991). Discarding the throwaway society: Worldwatch paper 101.
  13. (1992). Distinguishing potential recyclers from nonrecyclers: A basis for developing recycling strategies. doi
  14. (1994). Do we know what we need to know? Objective and subjective knowledge effects on pro-ecological behaviors. doi
  15. (1992). Earth Journal. doi
  16. (1991). Effects of probabilistic rewards on recycling attitudes and behavior. doi
  17. (1985). Encouraging environmentally appropriate behavior: The role of intrinsic motivation. doi
  18. (1996). Environmental Protection Agency. doi
  19. (1994). Environmental waste: Recycling attitudes and correlates. doi
  20. (1982). Evaluation participation in a residential recycling program. doi
  21. (1988). Exploring the difference between recyclers and non-recyclers: The role of information. doi
  22. (1991). Factors influencing household recycling behavior. doi
  23. (1995). George Jetson and the tragedy of the commons: Applying behavior analysis to the problem of waste management. doi
  24. (1993). Government buying can save tax dollars and the environment.
  25. (1990). Group commitment and resource conservation: Two field experiments on promoting recycling. doi
  26. (1991). How to throw things away. doi
  27. (1986). Increasing community recycling with persuasive communication and public commitment. doi
  28. (1993). Increasing recycling in office environments: The effects of specific, informative cues. doi
  29. (1985). Knowledge vs. NIMBY: Assessing Florida's strategy for siting hazardous waste disposal facilities. doi
  30. (1993). Market segmentation for recycling. doi
  31. (1994). Motivating recycling behavior: A quasiexperimental investigation of message and source strategies. doi
  32. (1990). Motivations and barriers to recycling: Toward a strategy for public education. doi
  33. (1996). Municipal solid waste disposal trends,
  34. (1995). of Environmental Quality. doi
  35. (1992). Predicting recycling behavior from global and specific environmental attitudes and changes in recycling opportunities. doi
  36. (1982). Preserving the environment: New strategies for behavior change.
  37. (1975). Promoting paper recycling on a university campus. doi
  38. (1993). Promoting source reduction behavior: The role of motivational information. doi
  39. (1991). Public participation and recycling performance: Explaining program success. doi
  40. (1993). Recycling and education: The critical link.
  41. (1994). Recycling as a marketing problem: A framework for strategy development. doi
  42. (1991). Recycling as altruistic behavior: Normative and behavioral strategies to expand participation in a community recycling program. doi
  43. (1993). Recycling for profit: The new green business frontier.
  44. (1992). Recycling in America: A reference handbook.
  45. (1995). Recycling in the states: doi
  46. (1996). Recycling program creates jobs, alleviates poverty.
  47. (1991). Recycling program design, management, and participation: A national survey of municipal experience. doi
  48. (1990). Recycling programs.
  49. (1992). Recycling: Five communities that do it right.
  50. (1995). Recycling: Myths and realities.
  51. (1978). Response maintenance and paper recycling. doi
  52. (1991). Social psychology and the stimulation of recycling behaviors: The block leader approach. doi
  53. (1995). Solid waste recovery: A review of behavioral programs to increase recycling. doi
  54. (1991). Solid waste/recycling information exchange.
  55. (1986). Some psychological aspects of recycling: The structure of conservation satisfactions. doi
  56. (1995). State of the world doi
  57. (1993). Study provides evidence of lower cost of recycling.
  58. (1993). The cost of recycling at the curb [Brochure].
  59. (1990). The do's and don'ts of successful recycling.
  60. (1983). The effect of strength of commitment on newspaper recycling. doi
  61. (1995). The effects of public commitment and group feedback on curbside recycling. doi
  62. (1993). The McGraw-Hill recycling handbook. doi
  63. (1990). The problem is the product. doi
  64. (1995). The real conservatives.
  65. (1994). The recycling of solid wastes: Personal values, value orientations, and attitudes about recycling as antecedents of recycling behavior. doi
  66. (1991). The role of perceived consumer effectiveness in motivating environmentally conscious behaviors.
  67. (1993). The social context of recycling. doi
  68. (1992). The use of posted feedback to promote recycling. doi
  69. (1990). What makes a recycler? A comparison of recyclers and nonrecyclers. doi
  70. (1991). Work with the media to promote recycling programs.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.