Article thumbnail


By Stephen G. Romero, Timothy C. Rickard and Lyle E. Bourne


Retrospective verbal protocols collected throughout participants ’ performance of a multiplication verification task (e.g., “7 3 = 28, true or false?”) documented a number of different strategies and changes in strategy use across different prob-lem categories used for this common experimental task. Correct answer retrieval and comparison to the candidate answer was the modal but not the only strategy reported. Experiment 1 results supported the use of a calculation algorithm on some trials and the use of the difference between the candidate and correct an-swers (i.e., split) on others. Experiment 2 clearly demonstrated that participants sometimes bypassed retrieval by relying on the split information. Implications for mental arithmetic theories and the general efficacy of retrospective protocols are discussed. Data relevant to theories of mental arithmetic come from both verifica-tion and production tasks. In a production task, participants are given a problem and asked to write, type, or say the correct answer (e.g., “3 4 =?”). In a verification task, participants are given a problem and a can

Year: 2014
DOI identifier: 10.1007/978-1-4842-0439-9_46
OAI identifier: oai:CiteSeerX.psu:
Provided by: CiteSeerX
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.